External quantum fluctuations select measurement contexts

Quantum paradoxes show that the outcomes of different quantum measurements cannot be described by a single measurement-independent reality. Any theoretical description of a quantum measurement implies the selection of a specific measurement context. Here, we investigate generalised quantum measurements, in order to identify the mechanism by which this specific context is selected. We show that external quantum fluctuations, represented by the initial state of the measurement apparatus, play an essential role in the selection of the context. This has the non-trivial consequence that, when considering measurements other than just idealised projection-valued measures, different outcomes of a single measurement setup can represent different measurement contexts. We further show this result underpins recent claims that contextuality can occur in scenarios without measurement incompatibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-05-13-2106
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
preprint
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

External quantum fluctuations select measurement contexts

Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita, Ming Ji, Holger F. Hofmann
Quantum
Quantum Information and Cryptography
preprint

External quantum fluctuations select measurement contexts

Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita, Ming Ji, Holger F. Hofmann
preprint en

Abstract

Quantum paradoxes show that the outcomes of different quantum measurements cannot be described by a single measurement-independent reality. Any theoretical description of a quantum measurement implies the selection of a specific measurement context. Here, we investigate generalised quantum measurements, in order to identify the mechanism by which this specific context is selected. We show that external quantum fluctuations, represented by the initial state of the measurement apparatus, play an essential role in the selection of the context. This has the non-trivial consequence that, when considering measurements other than just idealised projection-valued measures, different outcomes of a single measurement setup can represent different measurement contexts. We further show this result underpins recent claims that contextuality can occur in scenarios without measurement incompatibility.

QuantumVol. 10
Hiroshima University (JP), University of Bristol (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Royal Society, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Young Scientists Fund, Division of Mathematical Sciences, Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.