Species Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Challenges of Wild Mammals of Besmena‐Odubulu‐Controlled Hunting Area, Southeastern Ethiopia

Even though Ethiopia is among few African countries with high faunal species diversity, the recorded mammalian resource data are very low. Hence, compiling the baseline data on current wildlife ecological issues and conservation threats to wildlife’s in their respective area are crucial for better wildlife conservation and management purpose. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the current diversity, distribution, and conservation threats to wildlife of the Besmena‐Odubulu‐controlled hunting area between 2019 and 2020 during both dry and wet seasons. To achieve this objective, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The primary data were collected from focus group discussion and field survey of 30 representative random sampling of line transects. A sample of 40 household heads was purposively selected from the purposively selected four kebeles (Besmena, Wajitu‐Shabe, Wolta’i wocho, and Awash‐Kolati villages) for FGD. Similarly, for the field survey, the total area of the study was classified into four smaller sample units (montane forest habitat, woodland habitat, riverine habitat, and bamboo habitat) in such a way that each of the sample areas represents the major habitats of the study area. Descriptive statistics, biodiversity indices, and chi‐square tests were used to analyze the data. Hence, during the study, a total of 16 diurnal species of medium‐ and large‐sized mammals, grouped into 8 families, and 6 orders were identified. Based on the recorded data, 62.5% were large‐sized mammalian species, where the highest being Bovidae families with five species, and the remaining 37.5% were medium‐sized mammals. In our current survey, we also found endemic and endangered mammalian species such as mountain nyala ( Tragelphus buxtani ) and Menelik’s bushbuck ( Tragelphus scriptus Meneliki ). The most abundant species among those that have been identified are Phacochoerus africanus and Papio anubis , with respective abundances of 21.0% and 23.0%, followed by Tragelphus buxtoni (13.0%) and Tragelphus scriptus subsp. Menelik’s bushbuck (12.0%). However, Canis mesomelas (0.5%) was the least abundant species observed in the study area. Furthermore, the main threat to conservation that led to conflict between people and wildlife over the resources in the Besemena‐Odubulu‐controlled hunting area was the heavy dependency of the local community on those resource to sustain their lives. Therefore, it is necessary to implement community‐based conservation strategies together with practicable management plans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Zoology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijz/3071491
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Species Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Challenges of Wild Mammals of Besmena‐Odubulu‐Controlled Hunting Area, Southeastern Ethiopia

Getu Dida, Feto Haji, Dejene Worku
1 citations
International Journal of Zoology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Species Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Challenges of Wild Mammals of Besmena‐Odubulu‐Controlled Hunting Area, Southeastern Ethiopia

Getu Dida, Feto Haji, Dejene Worku
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Even though Ethiopia is among few African countries with high faunal species diversity, the recorded mammalian resource data are very low. Hence, compiling the baseline data on current wildlife ecological issues and conservation threats to wildlife’s in their respective area are crucial for better wildlife conservation and management purpose. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the current diversity, distribution, and conservation threats to wildlife of the Besmena‐Odubulu‐controlled hunting area between 2019 and 2020 during both dry and wet seasons. To achieve this objective, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The primary data were collected from focus group discussion and field survey of 30 representative random sampling of line transects. A sample of 40 household heads was purposively selected from the purposively selected four kebeles (Besmena, Wajitu‐Shabe, Wolta’i wocho, and Awash‐Kolati villages) for FGD. Similarly, for the field survey, the total area of the study was classified into four smaller sample units (montane forest habitat, woodland habitat, riverine habitat, and bamboo habitat) in such a way that each of the sample areas represents the major habitats of the study area. Descriptive statistics, biodiversity indices, and chi‐square tests were used to analyze the data. Hence, during the study, a total of 16 diurnal species of medium‐ and large‐sized mammals, grouped into 8 families, and 6 orders were identified. Based on the recorded data, 62.5% were large‐sized mammalian species, where the highest being Bovidae families with five species, and the remaining 37.5% were medium‐sized mammals. In our current survey, we also found endemic and endangered mammalian species such as mountain nyala ( Tragelphus buxtani ) and Menelik’s bushbuck ( Tragelphus scriptus Meneliki ). The most abundant species among those that have been identified are Phacochoerus africanus and Papio anubis , with respective abundances of 21.0% and 23.0%, followed by Tragelphus buxtoni (13.0%) and Tragelphus scriptus subsp. Menelik’s bushbuck (12.0%). However, Canis mesomelas (0.5%) was the least abundant species observed in the study area. Furthermore, the main threat to conservation that led to conflict between people and wildlife over the resources in the Besemena‐Odubulu‐controlled hunting area was the heavy dependency of the local community on those resource to sustain their lives. Therefore, it is necessary to implement community‐based conservation strategies together with practicable management plans.

International Journal of ZoologyVol. 2025(1)
Madda Walabu University (ET)
Madda Walabu University
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.