The impact of labeling automotive AI as trustworthy or reliable on user evaluation and technology acceptance

This study explores whether labeling AI as either "trustworthy" or "reliable" influences user perceptions and acceptance of automotive AI technologies. Utilizing a one-way between-subjects design, the research presented online participants (N = 478) with a text presenting guidelines for either trustworthy or reliable AI, before asking them to evaluate 3 vignette scenarios and fill in a modified version of the Technology Acceptance Model which covers different variables, such as perceived ease of use, human-like trust, and overall attitude. While labeling AI as "trustworthy" did not significantly influence people's judgements on specific scenarios, it increased perceived ease of use and human-like trust, namely benevolence, suggesting a facilitating influence on usability and an anthropomorphic effect on user perceptions. The study provides insights into how specific labels affect adopting certain perceptions of AI technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85558-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of labeling automotive AI as trustworthy or reliable on user evaluation and technology acceptance

Ophelia D. Deroy, John Dorsch
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

The impact of labeling automotive AI as trustworthy or reliable on user evaluation and technology acceptance

Ophelia D. Deroy, John Dorsch
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores whether labeling AI as either "trustworthy" or "reliable" influences user perceptions and acceptance of automotive AI technologies. Utilizing a one-way between-subjects design, the research presented online participants (N = 478) with a text presenting guidelines for either trustworthy or reliable AI, before asking them to evaluate 3 vignette scenarios and fill in a modified version of the Technology Acceptance Model which covers different variables, such as perceived ease of use, human-like trust, and overall attitude. While labeling AI as "trustworthy" did not significantly influence people's judgements on specific scenarios, it increased perceived ease of use and human-like trust, namely benevolence, suggesting a facilitating influence on usability and an anthropomorphic effect on user perceptions. The study provides insights into how specific labels affect adopting certain perceptions of AI technology.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of London (GB), School of Advanced Study (GB), Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of labeling automotive AI as trustworthy or reliable on user evaluation and technology acceptance — Ophelia D. Deroy, John Dorsch · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS