Anthropogenic litter and plastics across size classes on a mechanically groomed Great Lakes urban beach

Anthropogenic litter and plastic pollution are well-recognized global and Great Lakes stressors, but the distribution of plastic pollution on shorelines is uneven. Beaches in urban areas are close to many potential sources of plastic pollution and often heavily visited, so are likely exposed to high litter inputs. Conversely, beach maintenance activities, including mechanical grooming, may lower litter concentrations. In the summer of 2021, surface litter and > 2 mm anthropogenic materials within the top 5 cm of beach sediment were repeatedly measured along 10 transects at Euclid Beach, in Cleveland, Ohio. Plastics comprised 79 % of litter > 50 mm and 100 % of smaller visible litter on the beach surface. Surface litter concentrations (0.279 pieces m −2 ) were relatively low compared to previously studied Great Lakes strandlines, with mechanical grooming and beach visitor usage influencing litter distribution. However, when plastics within the top 5 cm of the beach sediment were included, Euclid Beach microplastics (54.7 pieces m −2 ) and mesoplastics (45.0 pieces m −2 ) concentrations were among the highest in the Great Lakes. Plastic production pellets were the most common microplastic morphology, while foamed plastics were the most common mesoplastics. Most plastics in the sediment were too small to be removed by mechanical grooming, but fragmentation of larger, weathered plastics is a potential concern deserving further investigation. Overall, our results suggest that urban, mechanically-groomed beaches can have high plastics loads. Such beaches should be strategically included in larger scale studies of plastic pollution along shorelines, especially when considering issues of environmental justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102505
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropogenic litter and plastics across size classes on a mechanically groomed Great Lakes urban beach

A. H. G. Mitchell, Sophia Muratori, Keirith Snyder, Anne J. Jefferson et al.
3 citations
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
article

Anthropogenic litter and plastics across size classes on a mechanically groomed Great Lakes urban beach

A. H. G. Mitchell, Sophia Muratori, Keirith Snyder, Anne J. Jefferson, Kayla Kearns, Christopher J. Rowan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Anthropogenic litter and plastic pollution are well-recognized global and Great Lakes stressors, but the distribution of plastic pollution on shorelines is uneven. Beaches in urban areas are close to many potential sources of plastic pollution and often heavily visited, so are likely exposed to high litter inputs. Conversely, beach maintenance activities, including mechanical grooming, may lower litter concentrations. In the summer of 2021, surface litter and > 2 mm anthropogenic materials within the top 5 cm of beach sediment were repeatedly measured along 10 transects at Euclid Beach, in Cleveland, Ohio. Plastics comprised 79 % of litter > 50 mm and 100 % of smaller visible litter on the beach surface. Surface litter concentrations (0.279 pieces m −2 ) were relatively low compared to previously studied Great Lakes strandlines, with mechanical grooming and beach visitor usage influencing litter distribution. However, when plastics within the top 5 cm of the beach sediment were included, Euclid Beach microplastics (54.7 pieces m −2 ) and mesoplastics (45.0 pieces m −2 ) concentrations were among the highest in the Great Lakes. Plastic production pellets were the most common microplastic morphology, while foamed plastics were the most common mesoplastics. Most plastics in the sediment were too small to be removed by mechanical grooming, but fragmentation of larger, weathered plastics is a potential concern deserving further investigation. Overall, our results suggest that urban, mechanically-groomed beaches can have high plastics loads. Such beaches should be strategically included in larger scale studies of plastic pollution along shorelines, especially when considering issues of environmental justice.

Journal of Great Lakes ResearchVol. 51(2)
University of Vermont (US), Kent State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.