Comparative study on blasting simulation vibration reduction and field vibration reduction experiment of adjacent oil pipeline

Introduction Yongxing Tunnel No.1’s complex geology near a buried oil pipeline on the Guizhou-Nanning high-speed route poses blasting risks. Prioritizing pipeline safety, efforts focus on minimizing vibration impacts. Methods Research uses numerical simulations and field tests to analyze three delay times and three spacing charge materials for vibration reduction. Results Optimal delay is 30 ms, yielding a 0.52 cm/s vibration velocity, 20%-29% lower than 28 ms and 32 ms. Soil is the most effective spacer, achieving 0.46 cm/s, 30.30%-22.03% lower than water and air. Field tests align with simulations. Discussion Findings provide a reference for optimal vibration reduction and safe construction under similar conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1489468
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blasting Impact and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study on blasting simulation vibration reduction and field vibration reduction experiment of adjacent oil pipeline

Chengyu Xie, Ruichong Zhang, Jiawei Chen, Yi Chen et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Earth Science
Blasting Impact and Analysis
1.01
article

Comparative study on blasting simulation vibration reduction and field vibration reduction experiment of adjacent oil pipeline

Chengyu Xie, Ruichong Zhang, Jiawei Chen, Yi Chen, Yi Wang, Lifang Liang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Yongxing Tunnel No.1’s complex geology near a buried oil pipeline on the Guizhou-Nanning high-speed route poses blasting risks. Prioritizing pipeline safety, efforts focus on minimizing vibration impacts. Methods Research uses numerical simulations and field tests to analyze three delay times and three spacing charge materials for vibration reduction. Results Optimal delay is 30 ms, yielding a 0.52 cm/s vibration velocity, 20%-29% lower than 28 ms and 32 ms. Soil is the most effective spacer, achieving 0.46 cm/s, 30.30%-22.03% lower than water and air. Field tests align with simulations. Discussion Findings provide a reference for optimal vibration reduction and safe construction under similar conditions.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 12
Guangxi University (CN), Wuzhou University (CN), Xiangtan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Blasting Impact and Analysis
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study on blasting simulation vibration reduction and field vibration reduction experiment of adjacent oil pipeline — Chengyu Xie, Ruichong Zhang, et al. · Frontiers in Earth Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS