Asciminib versus bosutinib following 2 or more prior therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia: a plain language summary of the ASCEMBL study

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a publication about the ASCEMBL study, which was published in Blood in November of 2021. Overall, researchers wanted to learn how well asciminib works compared to bosutinib, and how safe it is.The study included 233 adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). All study participants had been previously exposed to 2 or more courses of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but either did not respond to the treatment (referred to as being 'resistant') or needed to stop taking the medication due to side effects. Researchers wanted to know whether a new type of drug, called asciminib, could better improve the response of CML compared to standard therapy with a TKI called bosutinib. They also wanted to look at the side effects caused by asciminib compared to the ones caused by bosutinib. This is a summary of the published results at 24 weeks. What were the results? Researchers found that the improvement rate related to the patients’ treatment was higher in participants receiving asciminib. They looked at the chance of achieving major molecular response(MMR). After 24 weeks of therapy, MMR was higher in participants receiving asciminib (25.5%) compared to bosutinib (13.2%).The chance of achieving MMR was 12.2% higher in those treated with asciminib versus bosutinib. Furthermore, the proportion of patients who had to stop taking the drug due to side effects was much lower in those receiving asciminib (5.8%) compared to those taking bosutinib (21.1%). What are the key takeaways? Patients with chronic phase CML having previously been treated with 2 or more TKI treatments had greater benefit from asciminib compared to bosutinib. Asciminib was superior in terms of disease control, while also provoking fewer side effects. Asciminib could therefore be a treatment for people with CML who have not done well on other TKI treatments and could change the way CML is cared for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Oncology
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2439178
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asciminib versus bosutinib following 2 or more prior therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia: a plain language summary of the ASCEMBL study

Lisa Machado, Natasha Szuber, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim
2 citations
Future Oncology
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
3.54
article

Asciminib versus bosutinib following 2 or more prior therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia: a plain language summary of the ASCEMBL study

Lisa Machado, Natasha Szuber, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a publication about the ASCEMBL study, which was published in Blood in November of 2021. Overall, researchers wanted to learn how well asciminib works compared to bosutinib, and how safe it is.The study included 233 adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). All study participants had been previously exposed to 2 or more courses of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but either did not respond to the treatment (referred to as being 'resistant') or needed to stop taking the medication due to side effects. Researchers wanted to know whether a new type of drug, called asciminib, could better improve the response of CML compared to standard therapy with a TKI called bosutinib. They also wanted to look at the side effects caused by asciminib compared to the ones caused by bosutinib. This is a summary of the published results at 24 weeks. What were the results? Researchers found that the improvement rate related to the patients’ treatment was higher in participants receiving asciminib. They looked at the chance of achieving major molecular response(MMR). After 24 weeks of therapy, MMR was higher in participants receiving asciminib (25.5%) compared to bosutinib (13.2%).The chance of achieving MMR was 12.2% higher in those treated with asciminib versus bosutinib. Furthermore, the proportion of patients who had to stop taking the drug due to side effects was much lower in those receiving asciminib (5.8%) compared to those taking bosutinib (21.1%). What are the key takeaways? Patients with chronic phase CML having previously been treated with 2 or more TKI treatments had greater benefit from asciminib compared to bosutinib. Asciminib was superior in terms of disease control, while also provoking fewer side effects. Asciminib could therefore be a treatment for people with CML who have not done well on other TKI treatments and could change the way CML is cared for.

Future OncologyVol. 21(4)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.