Estimating turbulent heat flux by artificial intelligent models in comparison with diffusion hypothesis-based models

Accurately predicting turbulent heat flux remains a critical challenge in fluid dynamics, especially for complex flows like film cooling. Traditional models, such as the Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (GDH), the Generalized Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (GGDH), and the Higher-Order Generalized Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (HOGGDH), have shown limitations in providing accurate predictions. This study aims to predict turbulent heat fluxes ( u i ′ T ′ ‾ ) directly using machine learning techniques, specifically random forest, and neural networks, from the known flow features without using the aforementioned assumptions (without using GDH, GGDH, and HOGGDH as a hypothesis to correlate turbulent heat flux to temperature gradient). Large eddy simulations (LES) with the dynamic Smagorinsky model for subgrid scales were conducted for flow over a flat plate with film cooling, with Re of 17382 and blowing ratio and density ratio of 1 and 2. A high-fidelity dataset of 130,000 data points with 34 features was extracted from four distinct zones. These features include adiabatic effectiveness, temperature gradients in three directions, directional velocity derivatives in three directions, six Reynolds stress components, six shear strain rate components, directional velocity in three directions, turbulent kinetic energy, laminar Prandtl number, the turbulent viscosity ratio, and the directional turbulent heat fluxes as the target. By Principal component analysis (PCA) the dataset was reduced to 8 key features. These reduced features were used to train both the random forest and the neural network models. Results demonstrate that the machine learning models provide more accurate predictions of turbulent heat flux compared with GDH, GGDH, and HOGGDH models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Thermofluids
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating turbulent heat flux by artificial intelligent models in comparison with diffusion hypothesis-based models

Seyed Ali Abtahi Mehrjardi, Karim Mazaheri
1 citations
International Journal of Thermofluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
article

Estimating turbulent heat flux by artificial intelligent models in comparison with diffusion hypothesis-based models

Seyed Ali Abtahi Mehrjardi, Karim Mazaheri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurately predicting turbulent heat flux remains a critical challenge in fluid dynamics, especially for complex flows like film cooling. Traditional models, such as the Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (GDH), the Generalized Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (GGDH), and the Higher-Order Generalized Gradient Diffusion Hypothesis (HOGGDH), have shown limitations in providing accurate predictions. This study aims to predict turbulent heat fluxes ( u i ′ T ′ ‾ ) directly using machine learning techniques, specifically random forest, and neural networks, from the known flow features without using the aforementioned assumptions (without using GDH, GGDH, and HOGGDH as a hypothesis to correlate turbulent heat flux to temperature gradient). Large eddy simulations (LES) with the dynamic Smagorinsky model for subgrid scales were conducted for flow over a flat plate with film cooling, with Re of 17382 and blowing ratio and density ratio of 1 and 2. A high-fidelity dataset of 130,000 data points with 34 features was extracted from four distinct zones. These features include adiabatic effectiveness, temperature gradients in three directions, directional velocity derivatives in three directions, six Reynolds stress components, six shear strain rate components, directional velocity in three directions, turbulent kinetic energy, laminar Prandtl number, the turbulent viscosity ratio, and the directional turbulent heat fluxes as the target. By Principal component analysis (PCA) the dataset was reduced to 8 key features. These reduced features were used to train both the random forest and the neural network models. Results demonstrate that the machine learning models provide more accurate predictions of turbulent heat flux compared with GDH, GGDH, and HOGGDH models.

International Journal of ThermofluidsVol. 26
Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Climate action, Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating turbulent heat flux by artificial intelligent models in comparison with diffusion hypothesis-based models — Seyed Ali Abtahi Mehrjardi, Karim Mazaheri · International Journal of Thermofluids (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS