How Metros’ Catchment Area Affect Commuters Choice To Walk Or Use Feeder Modes?

The current research measures the impact of built environment parameters on the choice of access modes, specifically distinguishing between walking and feeder modes. A total of 600 responses were gathered from individuals within the catchment areas of 15 Delhi Metro stations, India to evaluate the commuters’ perceptions regarding the walk access environment and the service quality of feeder modes. Initially, structural equation modeling was employed to evaluate latent constructs related to walking. Subsequently, two mode choice models were examined: a basic model and an extended model. 'Comfort' and 'safety-security' exhibited negative associations with walking, indicating that individuals felt more comfortable and secure when using feeder modes rather than walking. Mesoscale built-environment factors were observed to positively impact walk-access to metro stations. Furthermore, variables such as path distance, gender, education levels, and monthly income were identified as having an adverse effect on walking as a mode of access to metro stations. The study's outcomes provide valuable insights for policy development to enhance walking in the catchment areas around metro stations, fostering a seamless and user-friendly built environment conducive to walking towards the metro.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.132
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Metros’ Catchment Area Affect Commuters Choice To Walk Or Use Feeder Modes?

Vivek Chauhan, Manoranjan Parida, Akshay Gupta, G. R. Bivina
2 citations
Transportation research procedia
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

How Metros’ Catchment Area Affect Commuters Choice To Walk Or Use Feeder Modes?

Vivek Chauhan, Manoranjan Parida, Akshay Gupta, G. R. Bivina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The current research measures the impact of built environment parameters on the choice of access modes, specifically distinguishing between walking and feeder modes. A total of 600 responses were gathered from individuals within the catchment areas of 15 Delhi Metro stations, India to evaluate the commuters’ perceptions regarding the walk access environment and the service quality of feeder modes. Initially, structural equation modeling was employed to evaluate latent constructs related to walking. Subsequently, two mode choice models were examined: a basic model and an extended model. 'Comfort' and 'safety-security' exhibited negative associations with walking, indicating that individuals felt more comfortable and secure when using feeder modes rather than walking. Mesoscale built-environment factors were observed to positively impact walk-access to metro stations. Furthermore, variables such as path distance, gender, education levels, and monthly income were identified as having an adverse effect on walking as a mode of access to metro stations. The study's outcomes provide valuable insights for policy development to enhance walking in the catchment areas around metro stations, fostering a seamless and user-friendly built environment conducive to walking towards the metro.

Transportation research procediaVol. 82
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), Central Road Research Institute (IN), Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.