A Geometric Model Simplification Strategy for CFD Simulation of the Cockpit Internal Environment

Computational Fluids Dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for optimizing the design of a cockpit’s internal environment, but the complex geometric models consume a significant amount of computational resources and time. Arbitrary simplification of geometric models may result in inaccurate calculations of physical fields. To address this issue, this study establishes a geometric model simplification strategy and successfully applies it to a cockpit. The implementation of the whole approach is divided into three steps, summarized in three methods, namely Sensitivity Analysis Method (SAM), Detail Suppression Method (DSM), and Evaluation Standards Method (ESM). Sensitivity analysis of the detailed features of the geometric model is performed using the adjoint method. The details of the geometric model are suppressed based on the principle of curvature continuity. After evaluation, the suppression degrees of detailed features with different sensitivity levels are obtained. The results demonstrate that this strategy can be employed to achieve precise simplification standards, thereby avoiding excessive deviations caused by arbitrary simplification and reducing the significant costs associated with trial-and-error simplification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.058773
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Geometric Model Simplification Strategy for CFD Simulation of the Cockpit Internal Environment

X.L. Wang, Hua Zhang
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

A Geometric Model Simplification Strategy for CFD Simulation of the Cockpit Internal Environment

X.L. Wang, Hua Zhang
article en

Abstract

Computational Fluids Dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for optimizing the design of a cockpit’s internal environment, but the complex geometric models consume a significant amount of computational resources and time. Arbitrary simplification of geometric models may result in inaccurate calculations of physical fields. To address this issue, this study establishes a geometric model simplification strategy and successfully applies it to a cockpit. The implementation of the whole approach is divided into three steps, summarized in three methods, namely Sensitivity Analysis Method (SAM), Detail Suppression Method (DSM), and Evaluation Standards Method (ESM). Sensitivity analysis of the detailed features of the geometric model is performed using the adjoint method. The details of the geometric model are suppressed based on the principle of curvature continuity. After evaluation, the suppression degrees of detailed features with different sensitivity levels are obtained. The results demonstrate that this strategy can be employed to achieve precise simplification standards, thereby avoiding excessive deviations caused by arbitrary simplification and reducing the significant costs associated with trial-and-error simplification.

Computer Modeling in Engineering & SciencesVol. 142(2)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Geometric Model Simplification Strategy for CFD Simulation of the Cockpit Internal Environment — X.L. Wang, Hua Zhang · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS