Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations

Abstract It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.61
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations

Rodney A. McCloy, Nathaniel M. Voss, Sarina M. Maneotis, Leslie B. Hammer et al.
5 citations
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
13.82
article

Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations

Rodney A. McCloy, Nathaniel M. Voss, Sarina M. Maneotis, Leslie B. Hammer, Kelsey L. Couture, Ryan Olson, Paul E. Spector, Joel A. DiGirolamo, Stacy A. Stoffregen, Jin Lee, Melissa Furman, Sarah Haidar
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 18(2)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), Kansas State University (US), University of Utah (US), University of South Florida (US), Tampa General Hospital (US), Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission (CA), Foundation for Human Potential (US), Workplace Technologies Research (US), Human Resources Research Organization (US), Protein Potential (United States) (US), ICF International (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
13.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.