Group Psychotherapy - Concepts and Interpretation Techniques

The concept of group interpretation, arising from the opposition to the concept of individual interpretation, necessarily had in its origin a teleological character. Group would be the interpretation that benefits the group and not any of its components, in which case the interpretation would be individual, although done in a group. It is understood that only in theory are there interpretations that deserve, rigorously, the name of individual interpretations in groups. In fact, for an interpretation to reach only one of the components of a group, it would be essential that there is no intercommunication between the affected patient, the beneficiary, and the other components of the group. It has never been possible to observe groups in which such intercommunication did not exist entirely. It seems to us that it always exists in all groups, even those in which integration is minimal. Good integration, it is time to remember, presupposes intercommunication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Family Medicine & Healthcare
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/2833-0382.1025
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group Psychotherapy - Concepts and Interpretation Techniques

André Luis Valera Gasparoto, Anita L R Saldanha, Alina MAPN da Silva, Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez et al.
International Journal of Family Medicine & Healthcare
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Group Psychotherapy - Concepts and Interpretation Techniques

André Luis Valera Gasparoto, Anita L R Saldanha, Alina MAPN da Silva, Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez, Ana Paula Pantoja Margeotto, Luiz Carlos Miller Paiva Nogueira da Silva
article en

Abstract

The concept of group interpretation, arising from the opposition to the concept of individual interpretation, necessarily had in its origin a teleological character. Group would be the interpretation that benefits the group and not any of its components, in which case the interpretation would be individual, although done in a group. It is understood that only in theory are there interpretations that deserve, rigorously, the name of individual interpretations in groups. In fact, for an interpretation to reach only one of the components of a group, it would be essential that there is no intercommunication between the affected patient, the beneficiary, and the other components of the group. It has never been possible to observe groups in which such intercommunication did not exist entirely. It seems to us that it always exists in all groups, even those in which integration is minimal. Good integration, it is time to remember, presupposes intercommunication.

International Journal of Family Medicine & HealthcareVol. 3(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.