‘I hate calling it a disability’: Exploring how labels impact adults with dyslexia through an intersectional lens

Background Limited research exists on the intricate relationship between dyslexia diagnoses and the impact of associated labels on adults. Dyslexia, affecting one in 10 adults, forming one of the largest neurodivergent groups, involves a diagnostic label that communicates difficulties but can also perpetuate stigma. This multifaceted condition includes biological, psychological, and social factors, with diverse terms used globally shaping societal perceptions. Methods This qualitative study, part of broader Australian research on dyslexic adults in employment, aims to explore preferences and perspectives on dyslexia-related labels. Involving 14 dyslexic individuals and 4 employers/managers, the study uses semi-structured interviews, employing discourse content analysis and interpretative repertoires methodology within an Intersectionality Framework. Four repertoires emerge, addressing Dyslexia the Label, Disability Label Paradigm, Dyslexia Is Not a Superpower, and The Impact of Labels on Sense of Self. Participants preferred ‘dyslexia’ over broader labels like ‘disability’, rejecting the superpower notion, while employers see dyslexia positively within work environments. Conclusion This study highlights the need for targeted support, advocating for strength-based labels to enhance self-perception and workplace environments, while addressing ableism. It calls for the dismantling of discriminatory practices in education, employment, and society for dyslexics. The research's novelty lies in its focus on adult dyslexic experiences within Australian workplaces.