The electronic Person‐Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) in the US population: What matters to individuals the most about their brain health

Abstract Background It is essential that both drug and lifestyle‐based interventions aimed at delaying the functional decline in conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRDs) capture change in functioning that incorporates the person’s voice. Such brain health priorities can vary across populations and it is unclear to what degree findings from the ePSOM program in the UK might apply to the US. Methods We conducted an online nationwide study to understand what matters to people aged 50 and older about their brain health in the US. The ePSOM US survey (May 2023‐Jan 2024) collected primarily free‐text responses, alongside sociodemographic information, self‐reported neurodegenerative disease diagnosis, and self‐reported confidence in managing personal priorities. We examined [1] the difference in relative frequency of specific words for key sociodemographic groups and comparable UK/US populations, and [2] compared the differences in confidence scores between the diagnosis and non‐diagnosis groups (gender and age controlled) using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 764 participants provided over 11,522 free text responses. Most were female (69%), married (63%), had higher education (64%) and did not report neurodegenerative disease diagnosis (93%); mean age 63.17 (SD = 8.52) in women, 62.99 (SD = 8.30) in men. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) in the pattern of responses between sub‐groups: younger/older; male/female; higher/lower education and UK/US populations but not between those with and without a diagnosis. Individuals with a diagnosis rated their confidence significantly lower (median score 20/25, IQR = [17,23]) than those without a diagnosis (median score 24/25, IQR = [22,25]; U = 8908, p<0.05). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that there is heterogeneity in the outcomes that matter to individuals about their brain health across sociodemographic groups and UK/US populations. These findings support the notion that emerging treatments in ADRD should be developed with a person‐centred approach that accounts for sociodemographic factors, and that confidence may be an appropriate construct to measure self‐perceived ability. Efforts such as the ePSOM program offer an evidence‐based method to capture and monitor personally meaningful treatment targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094340
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The electronic Person‐Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) in the US population: What matters to individuals the most about their brain health

Jeff Pobst, Ali Jannati, Stina Saunders, John Showalter et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

The electronic Person‐Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) in the US population: What matters to individuals the most about their brain health

Jeff Pobst, Ali Jannati, Stina Saunders, John Showalter, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Sean Tobyne, Joyce Rios Gomes‐Osman, William Isaiah Morrow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background It is essential that both drug and lifestyle‐based interventions aimed at delaying the functional decline in conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRDs) capture change in functioning that incorporates the person’s voice. Such brain health priorities can vary across populations and it is unclear to what degree findings from the ePSOM program in the UK might apply to the US. Methods We conducted an online nationwide study to understand what matters to people aged 50 and older about their brain health in the US. The ePSOM US survey (May 2023‐Jan 2024) collected primarily free‐text responses, alongside sociodemographic information, self‐reported neurodegenerative disease diagnosis, and self‐reported confidence in managing personal priorities. We examined [1] the difference in relative frequency of specific words for key sociodemographic groups and comparable UK/US populations, and [2] compared the differences in confidence scores between the diagnosis and non‐diagnosis groups (gender and age controlled) using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 764 participants provided over 11,522 free text responses. Most were female (69%), married (63%), had higher education (64%) and did not report neurodegenerative disease diagnosis (93%); mean age 63.17 (SD = 8.52) in women, 62.99 (SD = 8.30) in men. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) in the pattern of responses between sub‐groups: younger/older; male/female; higher/lower education and UK/US populations but not between those with and without a diagnosis. Individuals with a diagnosis rated their confidence significantly lower (median score 20/25, IQR = [17,23]) than those without a diagnosis (median score 24/25, IQR = [22,25]; U = 8908, p<0.05). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that there is heterogeneity in the outcomes that matter to individuals about their brain health across sociodemographic groups and UK/US populations. These findings support the notion that emerging treatments in ADRD should be developed with a person‐centred approach that accounts for sociodemographic factors, and that confidence may be an appropriate construct to measure self‐perceived ability. Efforts such as the ePSOM program offer an evidence‐based method to capture and monitor personally meaningful treatment targets.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S10)
Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.