A Brief Digital Neuropsychological Protocol: III ‐ Using Artificial Intelligence to Measure Semantic Memory with the ‘Animal’ Fluency Test

Abstract Background Semantic memory refers to knowledge of attributes associated with common objects. Quantifying the strength of semantic association between successive ‘animal' fluency responses can be challenging. The current research assessed between‐group differences for ‘animal' fluency total output and selected verbal serial list learning, episodic memory measures. Method Memory clinic patients were assessed with a digital neuropsychological protocol. Cluster analysis classified patients into normal (nl = 23), amnestic MCI (aMCI = 17), dysexecutive MCI (dMCI = 23), and dementia (dementia = 14) groups. During the protocol, patients were given 60secs to provide animal exemplars. Memory was assessed with the P(r)VLT, a 6‐word verbal serial list learning test. Using artificial intelligence assisted scoring all ‘animal' fluency and P(r)VLT outcome variables including the ‘animal' Association Index (AI), where the mean number of shared attributes between successive responses were automatically tallied. Result The nl group generated more animal exemplars than all other groups (p< 0.001; Table 1). aMCI and dMCI patients generated more responses than dementia patients (p< 0.043, both analyses). NL and dMCI patients produced a higher, more semantically connected, ‘animal' AI than dementia patients (nl > dem; p< 0.025, both analyses). Regression analysis (dv = ‘animal’ AI; block 1 = age, education, sex; block 2 = recognition prototypic & generic foils) was significant (R2 = 0.145, p< 0.023); and found that a reduced, more impaired ‘animal' AI was associated with increasing numbers of P(r)VLT prototypic recognition foils (beta = ‐0.276; p< 0.024). Regression analysis (dv = ‘animal’ AI; block 1 = age, education, sex; block 2 = P(r)VLT semantic cluster responses, P(r)VLT extra‐list intrusion errors) was not significant. Conclusion In addition to commonly used outcome measures such as total ‘animal' responses, this digital neuropsychological protocol scores a number of process variables, including the ‘animal' AI. The association between reduced ‘animal' AI and greater numbers of list learning prototypic recognition foils suggests combined episodic memory and semantic‐related impairment in selected patients. When brought to scale, automated analysis of neuropsychological process variables may aide in identifying emergent neurodegenerative illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094304
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Brief Digital Neuropsychological Protocol: III ‐ Using Artificial Intelligence to Measure Semantic Memory with the ‘Animal’ Fluency Test

Melissa Lamar, David J. Libon, David W. Bates, Rodney Swenson et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

A Brief Digital Neuropsychological Protocol: III ‐ Using Artificial Intelligence to Measure Semantic Memory with the ‘Animal’ Fluency Test

Melissa Lamar, David J. Libon, David W. Bates, Rodney Swenson, Ali Jannati, Russell Banks, John Showalter, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Sean Tobyne, Stephanie Cosentino, Catherine C. Price
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Semantic memory refers to knowledge of attributes associated with common objects. Quantifying the strength of semantic association between successive ‘animal' fluency responses can be challenging. The current research assessed between‐group differences for ‘animal' fluency total output and selected verbal serial list learning, episodic memory measures. Method Memory clinic patients were assessed with a digital neuropsychological protocol. Cluster analysis classified patients into normal (nl = 23), amnestic MCI (aMCI = 17), dysexecutive MCI (dMCI = 23), and dementia (dementia = 14) groups. During the protocol, patients were given 60secs to provide animal exemplars. Memory was assessed with the P(r)VLT, a 6‐word verbal serial list learning test. Using artificial intelligence assisted scoring all ‘animal' fluency and P(r)VLT outcome variables including the ‘animal' Association Index (AI), where the mean number of shared attributes between successive responses were automatically tallied. Result The nl group generated more animal exemplars than all other groups (p< 0.001; Table 1). aMCI and dMCI patients generated more responses than dementia patients (p< 0.043, both analyses). NL and dMCI patients produced a higher, more semantically connected, ‘animal' AI than dementia patients (nl > dem; p< 0.025, both analyses). Regression analysis (dv = ‘animal’ AI; block 1 = age, education, sex; block 2 = recognition prototypic & generic foils) was significant (R2 = 0.145, p< 0.023); and found that a reduced, more impaired ‘animal' AI was associated with increasing numbers of P(r)VLT prototypic recognition foils (beta = ‐0.276; p< 0.024). Regression analysis (dv = ‘animal’ AI; block 1 = age, education, sex; block 2 = P(r)VLT semantic cluster responses, P(r)VLT extra‐list intrusion errors) was not significant. Conclusion In addition to commonly used outcome measures such as total ‘animal' responses, this digital neuropsychological protocol scores a number of process variables, including the ‘animal' AI. The association between reduced ‘animal' AI and greater numbers of list learning prototypic recognition foils suggests combined episodic memory and semantic‐related impairment in selected patients. When brought to scale, automated analysis of neuropsychological process variables may aide in identifying emergent neurodegenerative illness.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S10)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of North Dakota (US), Stratford University (US), University of Florida (US), Rowan University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.