Current practice of accounting pressure–temperature conditions in porosity evaluation

Background. The problem of taking into account pressure–temperature conditions in estimating the porosity coefficient is raised. Objective. To emphasize the relevance of the problem and demonstrate the authors’ experience using the example of materials from terrigenous deposits. Materials and methods. A modern methodological approach to calculating effective isostatic pressure using core data, the results of geophysical studies of wells and testing of formations on a cable is considered. Results. The results of petrophysical modeling are presented, comparing the obtained conversion coefficients from atmospheric conditions to pressure–temperature conditions for the porosity coefficient, as well as reference values of the conversion coefficients based on the authors’ experience. Conclusions. The importance of interaction and simultaneous work of the specialists in different areas for effective planning of laboratory core research programs is noted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2024-15-4.art4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current practice of accounting pressure–temperature conditions in porosity evaluation

А.Yu. Kudymov, D.N. Gubinsky, Е.А. Зарай
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Current practice of accounting pressure–temperature conditions in porosity evaluation

А.Yu. Kudymov, D.N. Gubinsky, Е.А. Зарай
article en

Abstract

Background. The problem of taking into account pressure–temperature conditions in estimating the porosity coefficient is raised. Objective. To emphasize the relevance of the problem and demonstrate the authors’ experience using the example of materials from terrigenous deposits. Materials and methods. A modern methodological approach to calculating effective isostatic pressure using core data, the results of geophysical studies of wells and testing of formations on a cable is considered. Results. The results of petrophysical modeling are presented, comparing the obtained conversion coefficients from atmospheric conditions to pressure–temperature conditions for the porosity coefficient, as well as reference values of the conversion coefficients based on the authors’ experience. Conclusions. The importance of interaction and simultaneous work of the specialists in different areas for effective planning of laboratory core research programs is noted.

Actual Problems of Oil and GasVol. 15(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.