Potential Relative Effect of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Preventing White Matter Damage Across Age Groups

Abstract Background In the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering slowed progression of white matter injury (WMI) on MRI. We hypothesized that intensive lowering would be equally as effective and may confer greater benefits for brain health at younger ages compared to older ages. We tested whether the relative effects of intensive lowering on WMI differed by age using 2 MRI measures: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv) and peak‐width skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD) in SPRINT. Method Participants were age =50 with cardiovascular risk and randomized to intensive (SBP goal <120 mm Hg) or standard treatment (SBP goal <140 mm Hg). We calculated WMHv and PSMD in a subgroup of participants who had a baseline and follow‐up MRI. WMHv were inverse‐hyperbolic sine‐transformed, and the ratio of follow‐up to baseline used to quantify progression. PSMD progression was quantified as a difference. Using mixed‐effects linear models, we estimated the effects of age on relative progression in MRI markers between groups. Age effects were investigated as categorical (<65, 65‐75, or =75 years) or continuous. Result For participants in the intensive group (n=251 with follow‐up), mean SBP was 122 mmHg versus 135 mmHg in the standard group (n=201) over a median 3.9‐year MRI interval. The largest treatment effect on WMHv progression was found in the <65 age group (i.e. greatest relative reduction with intensive treatment): ‐0.19, 95%CI [‐0.27, ‐0.11]), followed by the 65‐75 age group (‐0.11, [‐0.21, ‐0.01]), and least in the >75 age group (‐0.06, [‐0.20, ‐0.08]) (Figure 1). Intensive treatment resulted in a 73%, 52%, and 20% reduction in WMHv progression respectively, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.21). Analyses of PSMD progression produced similar results (Figure 2). When using age as a continuous measure, the beneficial effect of intensive treatment waned with increasing age (Figure 3) without reaching statistical significance (p=0.19). Conclusion Intensive SBP lowering was equally as effective and may have a greater relative effect on reducing WMI when implemented at younger ages compared to older ages. Large prospective interventional studies that include younger individuals are needed to determine the effects of SBP on white matter integrity across the lifespan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094121
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Relative Effect of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Preventing White Matter Damage Across Age Groups

Pierre N. Tariot, William C. Cushman, Ilya M. Nasrallah, Clinton B. Wright et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Potential Relative Effect of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Preventing White Matter Damage Across Age Groups

Pierre N. Tariot, William C. Cushman, Ilya M. Nasrallah, Clinton B. Wright, Jeff D. Williamson, Nicholas M. Pajewski, Jeremy J. Pruzin, Kyle C. Kern, Aditi Gupta, David M. Reboussin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering slowed progression of white matter injury (WMI) on MRI. We hypothesized that intensive lowering would be equally as effective and may confer greater benefits for brain health at younger ages compared to older ages. We tested whether the relative effects of intensive lowering on WMI differed by age using 2 MRI measures: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv) and peak‐width skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD) in SPRINT. Method Participants were age =50 with cardiovascular risk and randomized to intensive (SBP goal <120 mm Hg) or standard treatment (SBP goal <140 mm Hg). We calculated WMHv and PSMD in a subgroup of participants who had a baseline and follow‐up MRI. WMHv were inverse‐hyperbolic sine‐transformed, and the ratio of follow‐up to baseline used to quantify progression. PSMD progression was quantified as a difference. Using mixed‐effects linear models, we estimated the effects of age on relative progression in MRI markers between groups. Age effects were investigated as categorical (<65, 65‐75, or =75 years) or continuous. Result For participants in the intensive group (n=251 with follow‐up), mean SBP was 122 mmHg versus 135 mmHg in the standard group (n=201) over a median 3.9‐year MRI interval. The largest treatment effect on WMHv progression was found in the <65 age group (i.e. greatest relative reduction with intensive treatment): ‐0.19, 95%CI [‐0.27, ‐0.11]), followed by the 65‐75 age group (‐0.11, [‐0.21, ‐0.01]), and least in the >75 age group (‐0.06, [‐0.20, ‐0.08]) (Figure 1). Intensive treatment resulted in a 73%, 52%, and 20% reduction in WMHv progression respectively, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.21). Analyses of PSMD progression produced similar results (Figure 2). When using age as a continuous measure, the beneficial effect of intensive treatment waned with increasing age (Figure 3) without reaching statistical significance (p=0.19). Conclusion Intensive SBP lowering was equally as effective and may have a greater relative effect on reducing WMI when implemented at younger ages compared to older ages. Large prospective interventional studies that include younger individuals are needed to determine the effects of SBP on white matter integrity across the lifespan.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Wake Forest University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.