Drug Trial Decision‐Making Among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and their Study Partners

Abstract Background Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials of candidate treatments enroll individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and biomarker evidence of AD. These trials require co‐enrollment with a study partner and complex decision‐making, weighing potential risks and benefits of participation. Some patients with MCI lack capacity to provide trial informed consent. Method We performed structured interviews with patients with MCI and their study partners. We presented a description of a hypothetical prodromal AD drug trial, followed by questionnaires to assess (a) involvement of the study partner in trial decisions, (b) patient capacity to consent, and (c) patient performance in health numeracy. We assessed level of agreement among dyads using the weighted kappa statistic and examined the frequency with which patients demonstrated impaired health numeracy and lack of capacity to provide consent. Result Among 65 patients with MCI, most were male (66%) and non‐Hispanic White (88%) with a mean (SD) age of 74.9 (8.4) years. Among 57 study partners, most were spouses (83%), female (74%), and non‐Hispanic White (91%) with a mean (SD) age of 70.3 (13.6). Half of patients (51%) and 72% of study partners reported being very or extremely likely to participate in the trial. Most patients (66%) and study partners (72%) stated that they would make the decision to enroll in the trial in partnership, while 28% of patients said they would make the decision on their own with input from their partner. Half of dyads (50%) agreed the decision would be made in partnership, but we found limited dyadic agreement overall (kappa = 0.187, 95% CI: ‐0.057‐0.431). Thirty‐eight percent of patients lacked capacity to consent. Patient health numeracy scores ranged from 3‐12 with a mean (SD) of 8.6 (2.5); 38% demonstrated impaired health numeracy. Sixteen patients (25%) demonstrated both a lack of capacity and impaired health numeracy, among whom seven patients reported they would make trial decisions on their own with input from a partner. Conclusion Some patients with MCI may be at risk for decision errors in the informed consent process for a prodromal AD clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091104
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug Trial Decision‐Making Among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and their Study Partners

Christian R. Salazar, Joshua D. Grill, Chelsea G. Cox, Daniel L. Gillen
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Drug Trial Decision‐Making Among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and their Study Partners

Christian R. Salazar, Joshua D. Grill, Chelsea G. Cox, Daniel L. Gillen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials of candidate treatments enroll individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and biomarker evidence of AD. These trials require co‐enrollment with a study partner and complex decision‐making, weighing potential risks and benefits of participation. Some patients with MCI lack capacity to provide trial informed consent. Method We performed structured interviews with patients with MCI and their study partners. We presented a description of a hypothetical prodromal AD drug trial, followed by questionnaires to assess (a) involvement of the study partner in trial decisions, (b) patient capacity to consent, and (c) patient performance in health numeracy. We assessed level of agreement among dyads using the weighted kappa statistic and examined the frequency with which patients demonstrated impaired health numeracy and lack of capacity to provide consent. Result Among 65 patients with MCI, most were male (66%) and non‐Hispanic White (88%) with a mean (SD) age of 74.9 (8.4) years. Among 57 study partners, most were spouses (83%), female (74%), and non‐Hispanic White (91%) with a mean (SD) age of 70.3 (13.6). Half of patients (51%) and 72% of study partners reported being very or extremely likely to participate in the trial. Most patients (66%) and study partners (72%) stated that they would make the decision to enroll in the trial in partnership, while 28% of patients said they would make the decision on their own with input from their partner. Half of dyads (50%) agreed the decision would be made in partnership, but we found limited dyadic agreement overall (kappa = 0.187, 95% CI: ‐0.057‐0.431). Thirty‐eight percent of patients lacked capacity to consent. Patient health numeracy scores ranged from 3‐12 with a mean (SD) of 8.6 (2.5); 38% demonstrated impaired health numeracy. Sixteen patients (25%) demonstrated both a lack of capacity and impaired health numeracy, among whom seven patients reported they would make trial decisions on their own with input from a partner. Conclusion Some patients with MCI may be at risk for decision errors in the informed consent process for a prodromal AD clinical trial.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.