An Ethnographic Analysis of The Black and African American Adult Male Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Social Determinants of Health

Abstract Background Black and African American adult males have the worst overall health than any other race or gender in the United States. The rate of Alzheimer’s Disease is twice as high for Black and African American adults. Yet, little is known about how Black and African American adult males perceive the relationship between the social determinants of health and Alzheimer’s Disease. Method We conducted a secondary analysis of ethnographic interview data from ten Black and African American adult male participants at an NIA‐funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Participants included both patients (n = 6) and study partners (n = 4) who were purposively sampled to ensure that a range of perspectives were represented in the parent study, Recruitment Innovations for Diversity Enhancement (RIDE) in Alzheimer’s Disease Research. Chronological age and education were self‐reported. For the present analysis, transcripts from semi‐structured participant interviews were first examined to organize the data within categories informed the Social Determinants of Health Model. Data within each social determinant of health category were then analyzed to identify themes and explore potential relationships within the data. Result All participants identified as male with a mean age of 75 (SD±13); 90% reported two or more years of post‐secondary education and 100% spontaneously mentioned elements of social determinants of health in response to questions about their experiences with dementia and motivations for participation in Alzheimer’s Disease research. A relationship between Alzheimer’s Disease and the social determinants of health was demonstrated by the study participants’ endorsement in across all domains. Locus of control, perception is reality, mistrust and othering are the thematic codes that consistently emerged from both the patient and caregiver interviews. The importance of having shared social characteristics (e.g., race) with clinicians, providers and staff members was a recurrent theme among the participants. Conclusion Despite the shared social characteristics of race and gender among the study participants, their perception of the relationship between Alzheimer’s disease and the social determinants of health was not monolithic. Findings support the need for additional research to examine the perceptions and lived experiences of Black and African American adult males as it relates to Alzheimer’s Disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089439
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Ethnographic Analysis of The Black and African American Adult Male Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Social Determinants of Health

Lilcelia A. Williams, Jennifer H. Lingler, Melita H Terry
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health disparities and outcomes
article

An Ethnographic Analysis of The Black and African American Adult Male Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Social Determinants of Health

Lilcelia A. Williams, Jennifer H. Lingler, Melita H Terry
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Black and African American adult males have the worst overall health than any other race or gender in the United States. The rate of Alzheimer’s Disease is twice as high for Black and African American adults. Yet, little is known about how Black and African American adult males perceive the relationship between the social determinants of health and Alzheimer’s Disease. Method We conducted a secondary analysis of ethnographic interview data from ten Black and African American adult male participants at an NIA‐funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Participants included both patients (n = 6) and study partners (n = 4) who were purposively sampled to ensure that a range of perspectives were represented in the parent study, Recruitment Innovations for Diversity Enhancement (RIDE) in Alzheimer’s Disease Research. Chronological age and education were self‐reported. For the present analysis, transcripts from semi‐structured participant interviews were first examined to organize the data within categories informed the Social Determinants of Health Model. Data within each social determinant of health category were then analyzed to identify themes and explore potential relationships within the data. Result All participants identified as male with a mean age of 75 (SD±13); 90% reported two or more years of post‐secondary education and 100% spontaneously mentioned elements of social determinants of health in response to questions about their experiences with dementia and motivations for participation in Alzheimer’s Disease research. A relationship between Alzheimer’s Disease and the social determinants of health was demonstrated by the study participants’ endorsement in across all domains. Locus of control, perception is reality, mistrust and othering are the thematic codes that consistently emerged from both the patient and caregiver interviews. The importance of having shared social characteristics (e.g., race) with clinicians, providers and staff members was a recurrent theme among the participants. Conclusion Despite the shared social characteristics of race and gender among the study participants, their perception of the relationship between Alzheimer’s disease and the social determinants of health was not monolithic. Findings support the need for additional research to examine the perceptions and lived experiences of Black and African American adult males as it relates to Alzheimer’s Disease.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Building Bridges (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.