Digital biomarker co‐design with patients and caregivers

Abstract Background Using artificial intelligence approaches enable automated assessment and analysis of speech biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease, for example using chatbot technology. However, current chatbots often are unsuitable for people with cognitive impairment. Here, we implemented a user‐centred‐design approach to evaluate and improve usability of a chatbot system for automated speech assessments for people with preclinical, prodromal and early dementia. Method Participants (n = 221 by January 2024, 300 planned, see Figure 1) of the PROSPECT‐AD study were automatically called for six times every three months by our chatbot “Mili”. In each call three cognitive tasks (Wordlist, Semantic Verbal Fluency, Story Telling) are offered. We applied the System Usability Scale (SUS) in all participants and conducted additional semi‐structured interviews in a subgroup to gain in‐depth information for improving Mili and adapting it to the users’ needs. During the interviews, we focus on affinity for technology and Mili’s usability. Result We collected usability data at M3 by the SUS from 163 participants (12 missings, ØAge: 73.2 years, SD: 6.6 years, see Figure 2) after their second call. The results indicated a good usability of Mili (ØSUS: 70.4/100, SD: 22.2). Within semi‐structured interviews we asked 22 participants (ØAge: 73.0 years, 12 female, ØMMST: 29.3, range 24‐30, medium tech‐savvy) for their ideas to improve the Mili system. We analysed the interviews using qualitative content analysis. Participants wished for an intelligent chatbot and a feedback system after each call about participants’ cognitive performance. In the event that the performance would indicate cognitive decline, Mili should provide information on local services for dementia, and give recommendations for prevention and advises for the user’s physician for medication. Seventeen interviewees (2 undecided, 3 negative) would like to use Mili regularly if they would receive a feedback on their cognitive performance. Conclusion Our results revealed a high usability and feasibility of the automated phone calls by Mili. Eligible feedback solutions would increase the usefulness and usage of remote testing if a they provide individual advises for prevention and contact persons. Unrealistic expectations on Mili regarding the recommendation of medication must be discussed with the users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.084095
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital biomarker co‐design with patients and caregivers

Antje Osterrath, Annika Spottke, Alexandra König, Stefanie Köhler et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Digital biomarker co‐design with patients and caregivers

Antje Osterrath, Annika Spottke, Alexandra König, Stefanie Köhler, Nicklas Linz, Michaela Butryn, Slawek Altenstein, Wenzel Glanz, Björn H. Schott, Matthias H. Munk, Stefan Teipel, Frank Jessen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Using artificial intelligence approaches enable automated assessment and analysis of speech biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease, for example using chatbot technology. However, current chatbots often are unsuitable for people with cognitive impairment. Here, we implemented a user‐centred‐design approach to evaluate and improve usability of a chatbot system for automated speech assessments for people with preclinical, prodromal and early dementia. Method Participants (n = 221 by January 2024, 300 planned, see Figure 1) of the PROSPECT‐AD study were automatically called for six times every three months by our chatbot “Mili”. In each call three cognitive tasks (Wordlist, Semantic Verbal Fluency, Story Telling) are offered. We applied the System Usability Scale (SUS) in all participants and conducted additional semi‐structured interviews in a subgroup to gain in‐depth information for improving Mili and adapting it to the users’ needs. During the interviews, we focus on affinity for technology and Mili’s usability. Result We collected usability data at M3 by the SUS from 163 participants (12 missings, ØAge: 73.2 years, SD: 6.6 years, see Figure 2) after their second call. The results indicated a good usability of Mili (ØSUS: 70.4/100, SD: 22.2). Within semi‐structured interviews we asked 22 participants (ØAge: 73.0 years, 12 female, ØMMST: 29.3, range 24‐30, medium tech‐savvy) for their ideas to improve the Mili system. We analysed the interviews using qualitative content analysis. Participants wished for an intelligent chatbot and a feedback system after each call about participants’ cognitive performance. In the event that the performance would indicate cognitive decline, Mili should provide information on local services for dementia, and give recommendations for prevention and advises for the user’s physician for medication. Seventeen interviewees (2 undecided, 3 negative) would like to use Mili regularly if they would receive a feedback on their cognitive performance. Conclusion Our results revealed a high usability and feasibility of the automated phone calls by Mili. Eligible feedback solutions would increase the usefulness and usage of remote testing if a they provide individual advises for prevention and contact persons. Unrealistic expectations on Mili regarding the recommendation of medication must be discussed with the users.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Bonn (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases (DE), University Hospital Magdeburg (DE), Cognition Behaviour Technology (FR), University Hospital Cologne (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), University of Rostock (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.