Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia

Abstract Background Agitation is a common and disabling symptom of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Pharmacological treatments are recommended if agitation is not responsive to psychosocial intervention. Citalopram was effective in treating agitation in AD but was associated with cognitive and cardiac risks linked to its R‐ but not S‐enantiomer. Primary objective of the Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease (S‐CitAD) study was to examine the efficacy and safety of escitalopram, in combination with PSI, for the treatment of agitation in patients with AD who fail to respond to psychosocial intervention. A secondary objective was to define groups with agitation most likely to benefit from escitalopram. Method S‐CitAD is an NIH‐funded, multicenter, community‐based, phase 3, double‐masked randomized placebo‐controlled trial. Assessments were conducted at enrollment, following three weeks of psychosocial intervention (baseline), and then weeks 1‐4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12. Participants were adults with AD, a telephone Mini‐Mental State Examination Telephone score from 3 to 20, and clinically significant agitation/aggression as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory with either frequency being “Very frequently”, or frequency being “Frequently” and severity being “Moderate” or “Marked”. Following three weeks of psychosocial intervention alone, participants not showing response were randomized (1:1) to receive escitalopram at a target dose of 15mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks while continuing PSI. Participants who responded to three weeks of psychosocial intervention alone continued to receive the intervention and were monitored on usual care through week 12. Primary outcome was the proportion of participants with clinically significant improvement in agitation from baseline on the modified Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study ‐ Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS‐CGIC). Result Two hundred and five (N = 205) participants were enrolled, and 173 were randomized to escitalopram or placebo for 12 weeks while continuing psychosocial intervention. The last participant will complete the study in late winter and mask will be broken in March 2024. Outcomes will be first presented at the AAIC meeting. Conclusion As escitalopram is a most commonly used treatment for disruptive behavior in dementia, the outcomes whether positive or negative will have major clinical impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085738
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia

Zahinoor Ismail, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Anton P. Porsteinsson, Sheriza Baksh et al.
3 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.16
article

Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia

Zahinoor Ismail, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Anton P. Porsteinsson, Sheriza Baksh, Lon S. Schneider, Tarek K. Rajji, David Shade, Prasad R. Padala, Paul B. Rosenberg, Amer M. Burhan, Hamid Reza Okhravi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Agitation is a common and disabling symptom of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Pharmacological treatments are recommended if agitation is not responsive to psychosocial intervention. Citalopram was effective in treating agitation in AD but was associated with cognitive and cardiac risks linked to its R‐ but not S‐enantiomer. Primary objective of the Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease (S‐CitAD) study was to examine the efficacy and safety of escitalopram, in combination with PSI, for the treatment of agitation in patients with AD who fail to respond to psychosocial intervention. A secondary objective was to define groups with agitation most likely to benefit from escitalopram. Method S‐CitAD is an NIH‐funded, multicenter, community‐based, phase 3, double‐masked randomized placebo‐controlled trial. Assessments were conducted at enrollment, following three weeks of psychosocial intervention (baseline), and then weeks 1‐4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12. Participants were adults with AD, a telephone Mini‐Mental State Examination Telephone score from 3 to 20, and clinically significant agitation/aggression as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory with either frequency being “Very frequently”, or frequency being “Frequently” and severity being “Moderate” or “Marked”. Following three weeks of psychosocial intervention alone, participants not showing response were randomized (1:1) to receive escitalopram at a target dose of 15mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks while continuing PSI. Participants who responded to three weeks of psychosocial intervention alone continued to receive the intervention and were monitored on usual care through week 12. Primary outcome was the proportion of participants with clinically significant improvement in agitation from baseline on the modified Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study ‐ Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS‐CGIC). Result Two hundred and five (N = 205) participants were enrolled, and 173 were randomized to escitalopram or placebo for 12 weeks while continuing psychosocial intervention. The last participant will complete the study in late winter and mask will be broken in March 2024. Outcomes will be first presented at the AAIC meeting. Conclusion As escitalopram is a most commonly used treatment for disruptive behavior in dementia, the outcomes whether positive or negative will have major clinical impact.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), University of Calgary (CA), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US), Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (CA), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (US), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), University of Rochester (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.