Risk factors and baseline cognition. Preliminary results from the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort

Abstract Background LatAm‐FINGERS ‐ the first non‐pharmacological multicenter randomized clinical trial in Latin America ‐ is a valuable opportunity to study lifestyle in a heterogeneous and multiethnic population exposed to a large number of cardiovascular risk factors. Our aims are to study the risk distribution in the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort and to explore the relationship between LIfestyle for BRAin Health (LIBRA) and cognition. Method We calculated the risk of dementia using the LIBRA score in the entire cohort (n = 1200). LIBRA consists of a weighted sum score (higher scores indicating greater dementia risk) of 12 modifiable risk and protective factors for cognitive decline. Cognition was assessed using the Latin America Neuropsychological Test Battery (LatAm‐NTB). We constructed mixed‐effects linear regression models to examine the relationship between the LIBRA and cognition as a fixed effect, with country as a random effect. Result The LIBRA ranged from ‐4.5 to 10, with a mean of 2.39 (±2.75). Men had significantly higher LIBRA scores than women (w = 125887, p = .003). Those with more education (>9 years) scored significantly lower in LIBRA compared to those with less education (w = 57458, p < .001), possibly due to the established association between education and health outcomes. No differences were found in LIBRA between individuals with and without APOE4 (w = 17475, p = 0.57). A significant relationship was observed between LIBRA and global cognition measured by LatAm‐NTB (β = ‐0.03, std. error = 0.004, t value = ‐9.28, p < .001). There was a relationship between LIBRA and memory (β = ‐0.05, std. error = 0.007, t value = ‐7.06, p < .001), executive functions (β = ‐0.02, std. error = 0.004, t value = ‐5.49, p < .001), and processing speed composites (β = ‐0.01, std. error = 0.005, t value = ‐3.30, p < .001). Conclusion Our results shed light on sex differences, revealing that men tend to exhibit higher LIBRA. The negative relationship between higher levels of education and LIBRA underscores the protective role of education on cognition. This highlights the significance of LIBRA as a useful risk composite for elucidating cognitive outcomes within the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort, characterized by its ethnic and cultural diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091921
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors and baseline cognition. Preliminary results from the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort

Ezequiel Surace, Lina Velilla, Nicolás Corvalán, Mônica Sanches Yassuda et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Risk factors and baseline cognition. Preliminary results from the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort

Ezequiel Surace, Lina Velilla, Nicolás Corvalán, Mônica Sanches Yassuda, Francisco Lopera, Paulo Caramelli, Lucía Crivelli, Greta Keller, Cláudia Kimie Suemoto, Ricardo Nitríni, Ana Luisa Sosa, Rosa Maria Salinas‐Contreras, Ricardo Allegri, Ismael Luis Calandri, Gustavo Sevlever, Sônia Maria Dozzi Brucki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background LatAm‐FINGERS ‐ the first non‐pharmacological multicenter randomized clinical trial in Latin America ‐ is a valuable opportunity to study lifestyle in a heterogeneous and multiethnic population exposed to a large number of cardiovascular risk factors. Our aims are to study the risk distribution in the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort and to explore the relationship between LIfestyle for BRAin Health (LIBRA) and cognition. Method We calculated the risk of dementia using the LIBRA score in the entire cohort (n = 1200). LIBRA consists of a weighted sum score (higher scores indicating greater dementia risk) of 12 modifiable risk and protective factors for cognitive decline. Cognition was assessed using the Latin America Neuropsychological Test Battery (LatAm‐NTB). We constructed mixed‐effects linear regression models to examine the relationship between the LIBRA and cognition as a fixed effect, with country as a random effect. Result The LIBRA ranged from ‐4.5 to 10, with a mean of 2.39 (±2.75). Men had significantly higher LIBRA scores than women (w = 125887, p = .003). Those with more education (>9 years) scored significantly lower in LIBRA compared to those with less education (w = 57458, p < .001), possibly due to the established association between education and health outcomes. No differences were found in LIBRA between individuals with and without APOE4 (w = 17475, p = 0.57). A significant relationship was observed between LIBRA and global cognition measured by LatAm‐NTB (β = ‐0.03, std. error = 0.004, t value = ‐9.28, p < .001). There was a relationship between LIBRA and memory (β = ‐0.05, std. error = 0.007, t value = ‐7.06, p < .001), executive functions (β = ‐0.02, std. error = 0.004, t value = ‐5.49, p < .001), and processing speed composites (β = ‐0.01, std. error = 0.005, t value = ‐3.30, p < .001). Conclusion Our results shed light on sex differences, revealing that men tend to exhibit higher LIBRA. The negative relationship between higher levels of education and LIBRA underscores the protective role of education on cognition. This highlights the significance of LIBRA as a useful risk composite for elucidating cognitive outcomes within the LatAm‐FINGERS cohort, characterized by its ethnic and cultural diversity.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (AR), Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva (AR), Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.