Effects of Different Intensity Exergame Balance Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients with MCI

Abstract Integrating balance and cognitive training of varied intensities through exergame balance training may offer a distinct approach to enhancing balance and cognitive abilities in patients with mild cognitive impairment. The objective is to determine the relationship and effects of exergame balance training of different intensities on balance and cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this four‐arm parallel design Randomized Clinical Trial, ninety‐seven participants with mild cognitive impairments MoCA (18‐24), between the ages of 50 and 75 years, participated in novel exergame balance training. They were randomly assigned to one of four exergame balance training groups (mild, moderate, high, and control). All participants received twenty‐four sessions including forty minutes/sessions three times/week. The MoCA and BDNF were used to assess cognition, time up and go test (TUG), TUG dual task for functional mobility, Gait speed normal and fast for dynamic stability at baseline, after the 4th and 8th week. The correlation between cognition and balance was determined by spearman’s correlation. The mixed model analysis of covariance while fixing the baseline values as a covariate was used to determine interaction effects between interventions and time. Post hoc analysis was performed to investigate the findings between different complexity levels and the control group, and repeated measure ANOVA to determine within group differences. There was a strong relationship between MoCA and TUG, TUG dual task with (r s = 0.41), (r s = 0.43) respectively and moderate relationship between MoCA and slow and Fast gait speed (r s = 0.15), (r s = 0.24) respectively of high intensity group. A significant interaction effect of group and time was observed for MoCA, TUG (1,3) = 19.34, <0.001, η2 = 0.217, TUG dual task (1,3) = 21.24, <0.001, η2 = 0.233, gait speed fast tests (1,3) = 11.889, 0.001, η2 = 0.151. Post‐hoc analysis at different intensities demonstrated a significant difference between mild, moderate and high complexity groups with the control group for MoCA, TUG, TUG dual task, Gait speed normal and fast (p<0.01). The results indicate that exergame balance training of mild, moderate and high complexity influence the balance and cognition abilities differently with the improvement in the high intensity to a greater extent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090844
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Different Intensity Exergame Balance Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients with MCI

Imran Amjad, Aruba Saeed
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Children's Physical and Motor Development
0.79
article

Effects of Different Intensity Exergame Balance Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients with MCI

Imran Amjad, Aruba Saeed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrating balance and cognitive training of varied intensities through exergame balance training may offer a distinct approach to enhancing balance and cognitive abilities in patients with mild cognitive impairment. The objective is to determine the relationship and effects of exergame balance training of different intensities on balance and cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this four‐arm parallel design Randomized Clinical Trial, ninety‐seven participants with mild cognitive impairments MoCA (18‐24), between the ages of 50 and 75 years, participated in novel exergame balance training. They were randomly assigned to one of four exergame balance training groups (mild, moderate, high, and control). All participants received twenty‐four sessions including forty minutes/sessions three times/week. The MoCA and BDNF were used to assess cognition, time up and go test (TUG), TUG dual task for functional mobility, Gait speed normal and fast for dynamic stability at baseline, after the 4th and 8th week. The correlation between cognition and balance was determined by spearman’s correlation. The mixed model analysis of covariance while fixing the baseline values as a covariate was used to determine interaction effects between interventions and time. Post hoc analysis was performed to investigate the findings between different complexity levels and the control group, and repeated measure ANOVA to determine within group differences. There was a strong relationship between MoCA and TUG, TUG dual task with (r s = 0.41), (r s = 0.43) respectively and moderate relationship between MoCA and slow and Fast gait speed (r s = 0.15), (r s = 0.24) respectively of high intensity group. A significant interaction effect of group and time was observed for MoCA, TUG (1,3) = 19.34, <0.001, η2 = 0.217, TUG dual task (1,3) = 21.24, <0.001, η2 = 0.233, gait speed fast tests (1,3) = 11.889, 0.001, η2 = 0.151. Post‐hoc analysis at different intensities demonstrated a significant difference between mild, moderate and high complexity groups with the control group for MoCA, TUG, TUG dual task, Gait speed normal and fast (p<0.01). The results indicate that exergame balance training of mild, moderate and high complexity influence the balance and cognition abilities differently with the improvement in the high intensity to a greater extent.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S5)
Riphah International University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.