Health‐related Quality of Life in People living with Dementia – Over and Underestimation of Proxy‐ratings

Abstract Background Proxy ratings primarily provided by informal caregivers are usually administered if patients living with dementia (PlwD) are cognitively unable to rate health independently. The literature is limited by the use of typically agreement statistics, reporting that proxies generally underestimate PlwD health. Additional analyses of self‐ and proxy‐rated discrepancies in individual responses that focus on HRQoL dimensions are lacking. We examined discrepancies between self‐ and proxy‐rated health in PlwD on an individual response level. Method We analyzed baseline data of n = 174 dyads (PlwD and their caregivers) of a cluster‐randomized, controlled intervention trial. HRQoL was assessed with the EQ‐5D‐5L from a self‐ and proxy‐proxy perspective together with sociodemographic and clinical data. The EQ‐5D‐5L consists of five dimensions (“mobility”, “self‐care”, “usual activity”, “pain/discomfort”, “anxiety/depression”), each with five response options. Initially, we calculated agreement statistics (weighted kappa) for each dimension. For individual response levels, we analyzed the degree of inconsistencies between self‐ and proxy ratings ranging from 0 (identical responses in all dimensions) to 5 (different responses in all five dimensions). We grouped the PlwD into “no problems” and “problems” depending on the EQ‐5D‐5L response of each dimensions to compare the response distances between PlwD and caregivers. Result PlwD had a mean age of 80.1 years (49.1% female) with a MMSE mean score of 19.2; informal caregivers were, on average, 67.9 years old (67.8% female). Every third PlwD lived alone. In general, PlwD rated their HRQoL better than proxies (EQ‐5D‐5L indices: 0.75±0.25 vs 0.68±0.23; p<0.01). Nine dyads (5%) showed identical ratings, whereas 95% rated their health differently. Weighted kappa coefficients were lowest for the dimension usual activity (0.23) and highest for pain/discomfort (0.40). Among the grouped PlwD without and with problems, proxies estimated PlwD HRQoL worse (underestimation) or better (overestimation), respectively. This was due to a central‐tendency‐bias of caregivers, two times more frequently selecting mid‐response options, particularly apparent in mobility, usual activities, and self‐care. Conclusion The two trends of contrary response behaviour (over‐ and underestimation & central tendency bias) could be caused by uncertainties of caregivers, underlining the challenge of using both perspectives interchangeably. Further research is needed when using HRQoL measures as proxy instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089782
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health‐related Quality of Life in People living with Dementia – Over and Underestimation of Proxy‐ratings

Lidia Engel, Maresa Buchholz, Bernhard Michalowsky, Niklas Weber
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Health‐related Quality of Life in People living with Dementia – Over and Underestimation of Proxy‐ratings

Lidia Engel, Maresa Buchholz, Bernhard Michalowsky, Niklas Weber
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Proxy ratings primarily provided by informal caregivers are usually administered if patients living with dementia (PlwD) are cognitively unable to rate health independently. The literature is limited by the use of typically agreement statistics, reporting that proxies generally underestimate PlwD health. Additional analyses of self‐ and proxy‐rated discrepancies in individual responses that focus on HRQoL dimensions are lacking. We examined discrepancies between self‐ and proxy‐rated health in PlwD on an individual response level. Method We analyzed baseline data of n = 174 dyads (PlwD and their caregivers) of a cluster‐randomized, controlled intervention trial. HRQoL was assessed with the EQ‐5D‐5L from a self‐ and proxy‐proxy perspective together with sociodemographic and clinical data. The EQ‐5D‐5L consists of five dimensions (“mobility”, “self‐care”, “usual activity”, “pain/discomfort”, “anxiety/depression”), each with five response options. Initially, we calculated agreement statistics (weighted kappa) for each dimension. For individual response levels, we analyzed the degree of inconsistencies between self‐ and proxy ratings ranging from 0 (identical responses in all dimensions) to 5 (different responses in all five dimensions). We grouped the PlwD into “no problems” and “problems” depending on the EQ‐5D‐5L response of each dimensions to compare the response distances between PlwD and caregivers. Result PlwD had a mean age of 80.1 years (49.1% female) with a MMSE mean score of 19.2; informal caregivers were, on average, 67.9 years old (67.8% female). Every third PlwD lived alone. In general, PlwD rated their HRQoL better than proxies (EQ‐5D‐5L indices: 0.75±0.25 vs 0.68±0.23; p<0.01). Nine dyads (5%) showed identical ratings, whereas 95% rated their health differently. Weighted kappa coefficients were lowest for the dimension usual activity (0.23) and highest for pain/discomfort (0.40). Among the grouped PlwD without and with problems, proxies estimated PlwD HRQoL worse (underestimation) or better (overestimation), respectively. This was due to a central‐tendency‐bias of caregivers, two times more frequently selecting mid‐response options, particularly apparent in mobility, usual activities, and self‐care. Conclusion The two trends of contrary response behaviour (over‐ and underestimation & central tendency bias) could be caused by uncertainties of caregivers, underlining the challenge of using both perspectives interchangeably. Further research is needed when using HRQoL measures as proxy instruments.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.