Errors on Cognitive Testing in Asymptomatic and Prodromal Familial Frontotemporal Dementia and their Prognostic Utility

Abstract Background The earliest cognitive manifestations of asymptomatic and prodromal familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) mutation carriers are still being characterized. Patients with symptomatic FTD are known to be error prone, particularly on tasks of executive function, but little is known about the frequency or predictive utility of these errors in the earliest stages of f‐FTD. The current study compared error rates on executive functioning tasks in controls and asymptomatic and prodromal mutation carriers and investigated whether errors predict worsening clinical status as follow up. Method This study included 90 participants (mean age = 48.57, SD = 13.30; 51.1% female; 86.67% white) with pathogenic FTD mutations (C9orf72, n = 45; GRN, n = 30; or MAPT, n = 15) who were asymptomatic or prodromal (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD ≤ 0.5). Propensity score matching identified (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0) who did not carry pathogenic mutation but were matched on age, education, and sex. Regressions were used to compare controls and mutation carriers on error scores (rule violations and/or repetitions) from three executive functioning tasks: design fluency, lexical fluency, and Stroop inhibition. Mutation carriers with longitudinal data within 1.5 years were binarized as stable (n = 35) or progressors (n = 13) based on whether their CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes score was worse at follow up (mean follow up = 1.07 years). Regressions were fit to evaluate the relationship between baseline error scores and group (i.e., stable vs. progressor). Result Mutation carriers committed significantly more errors than controls on the Stroop task (β = 0.67, p = 0.03) and lexical fluency (repetitions: β = 0.27, p = 0.02). The groups did not significantly differ in errors on the remaining tasks. A greater number of Stroop errors predicted mutation carriers who progressed at follow up (β = 1.04, p<0.001). When introducing the primary outcome from each task as a covariate (e.g., correct responses), the fluency task (repetitions: β = 0.10, p = 0.03) and Stroop task (errors: β = 0.82, p<0.001) were significantly associated with progression. Conclusion Errors on executive tasks may be early cognitive features in familial FTD. Importantly, errors were uniquely predictive above and beyond total scores. Research in larger samples will enable investigations of genetic differences in error rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093114
Primary Topic
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Errors on Cognitive Testing in Asymptomatic and Prodromal Familial Frontotemporal Dementia and their Prognostic Utility

Mark Sanderson‐Cimino, Hilary W. Heuer, Adam M. Staffaroni, Amy B. Wise et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
article

Errors on Cognitive Testing in Asymptomatic and Prodromal Familial Frontotemporal Dementia and their Prognostic Utility

Mark Sanderson‐Cimino, Hilary W. Heuer, Adam M. Staffaroni, Amy B. Wise, Bruce L. Miller, Kaitlin Blackstone Casaletto, Jack C. Taylor, Bradley F. Boeve, William W. Seeley, Leah K. Forsberg, Emily W. Paolillo, Sreya Dhanam, Joel H. Kramer, Adam L. Boxer, Howard J. Rosen, Maria Luisa Gorno Tempini, Brandon R. Palacios, Minh Bui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The earliest cognitive manifestations of asymptomatic and prodromal familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) mutation carriers are still being characterized. Patients with symptomatic FTD are known to be error prone, particularly on tasks of executive function, but little is known about the frequency or predictive utility of these errors in the earliest stages of f‐FTD. The current study compared error rates on executive functioning tasks in controls and asymptomatic and prodromal mutation carriers and investigated whether errors predict worsening clinical status as follow up. Method This study included 90 participants (mean age = 48.57, SD = 13.30; 51.1% female; 86.67% white) with pathogenic FTD mutations (C9orf72, n = 45; GRN, n = 30; or MAPT, n = 15) who were asymptomatic or prodromal (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD ≤ 0.5). Propensity score matching identified (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0) who did not carry pathogenic mutation but were matched on age, education, and sex. Regressions were used to compare controls and mutation carriers on error scores (rule violations and/or repetitions) from three executive functioning tasks: design fluency, lexical fluency, and Stroop inhibition. Mutation carriers with longitudinal data within 1.5 years were binarized as stable (n = 35) or progressors (n = 13) based on whether their CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes score was worse at follow up (mean follow up = 1.07 years). Regressions were fit to evaluate the relationship between baseline error scores and group (i.e., stable vs. progressor). Result Mutation carriers committed significantly more errors than controls on the Stroop task (β = 0.67, p = 0.03) and lexical fluency (repetitions: β = 0.27, p = 0.02). The groups did not significantly differ in errors on the remaining tasks. A greater number of Stroop errors predicted mutation carriers who progressed at follow up (β = 1.04, p<0.001). When introducing the primary outcome from each task as a covariate (e.g., correct responses), the fluency task (repetitions: β = 0.10, p = 0.03) and Stroop task (errors: β = 0.82, p<0.001) were significantly associated with progression. Conclusion Errors on executive tasks may be early cognitive features in familial FTD. Importantly, errors were uniquely predictive above and beyond total scores. Research in larger samples will enable investigations of genetic differences in error rates.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Mayo Clinic (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), WinnMed (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.