Assessment of Weekly Fluctuations in Zarit Burden Interview Scores in Caregivers of Individuals with Cognitive Impairment

Abstract Background Current tools to assess caregiver burden in individuals caring for people living with dementia commonly involve the use of questionnaires administered at infrequent intervals. Caregiver burden can vary significantly between individuals and at different time points throughout the progression of the disease. There has been research investigating the determinants of caregiver burden, but less is known about what represents a clinically‐meaningful amount of intra‐individual change in caregiver burden. The objective of this preliminary analysis is to present data showing change in caregiver burden over time in a cohort with frequent collection of burden level. Method Data were derived from longitudinal studies involving the ORCATECH technology platform, consisting of ambient, wearable and other sensors deployed in participants’ homes collecting continuous data on daily activities. Participants were individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia living with a caregiver (one dyad per home). Caregivers completed the Zarit Burden Interview Short Version (ZBI‐12, range 0‐48) weekly through the duration of their participation. ZBI‐12 scores and their distribution were analyzed. Result Data are presented from 47 dyads. Caregivers completed a total of 2949 weekly ZBI‐12 questionnaires (range 2‐118). Caregivers had a mean age of 71.3 and 68% were female. The mean ZBI‐12 score was 15.5 (SD 9.5, range 0‐44). The modal distribution of ZBI‐12 scores demonstrated peaks at 2‐4, 11‐12, and 22‐24, at low, moderate and high levels of burden. The variability in ZBI‐12 scores (standard deviation) increased with the total mean ZBI‐12 score (r 2 = 0.23) per participant. Conclusion Caregiver burden ranged from very low to high and fluctuated week‐to‐week in the majority of caregivers of individuals with MCI and dementia. Caregivers who had a higher average level of burden also had more variability in their ZBI‐12 scores. More frequent assessments of caregiver burden could help to provide a more complete picture of the dementia care situation. Novel approaches, such as continuous monitoring using home sensors, may provide a method to assess variability in burden level. Future work will evaluate changes in ZBI‐12 scores that represent clinically meaningful differences in caregiver burden and sensor outcome measures that predict higher levels of burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Weekly Fluctuations in Zarit Burden Interview Scores in Caregivers of Individuals with Cognitive Impairment

Bruce Wallace, Neil Thomas, Zachary Beattie, Julien Larivière-Chartier et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health and Well-being Studies
0.64
article

Assessment of Weekly Fluctuations in Zarit Burden Interview Scores in Caregivers of Individuals with Cognitive Impairment

Bruce Wallace, Neil Thomas, Zachary Beattie, Julien Larivière-Chartier, Lisa Sheehy, Laura Ault, Bahareh Chimehi, Joel S. Steele, Lyndsey Miller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Current tools to assess caregiver burden in individuals caring for people living with dementia commonly involve the use of questionnaires administered at infrequent intervals. Caregiver burden can vary significantly between individuals and at different time points throughout the progression of the disease. There has been research investigating the determinants of caregiver burden, but less is known about what represents a clinically‐meaningful amount of intra‐individual change in caregiver burden. The objective of this preliminary analysis is to present data showing change in caregiver burden over time in a cohort with frequent collection of burden level. Method Data were derived from longitudinal studies involving the ORCATECH technology platform, consisting of ambient, wearable and other sensors deployed in participants’ homes collecting continuous data on daily activities. Participants were individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia living with a caregiver (one dyad per home). Caregivers completed the Zarit Burden Interview Short Version (ZBI‐12, range 0‐48) weekly through the duration of their participation. ZBI‐12 scores and their distribution were analyzed. Result Data are presented from 47 dyads. Caregivers completed a total of 2949 weekly ZBI‐12 questionnaires (range 2‐118). Caregivers had a mean age of 71.3 and 68% were female. The mean ZBI‐12 score was 15.5 (SD 9.5, range 0‐44). The modal distribution of ZBI‐12 scores demonstrated peaks at 2‐4, 11‐12, and 22‐24, at low, moderate and high levels of burden. The variability in ZBI‐12 scores (standard deviation) increased with the total mean ZBI‐12 score (r 2 = 0.23) per participant. Conclusion Caregiver burden ranged from very low to high and fluctuated week‐to‐week in the majority of caregivers of individuals with MCI and dementia. Caregivers who had a higher average level of burden also had more variability in their ZBI‐12 scores. More frequent assessments of caregiver burden could help to provide a more complete picture of the dementia care situation. Novel approaches, such as continuous monitoring using home sensors, may provide a method to assess variability in burden level. Future work will evaluate changes in ZBI‐12 scores that represent clinically meaningful differences in caregiver burden and sensor outcome measures that predict higher levels of burden.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Ottawa (CA), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of North Dakota (US), Bruyère (CA), Layton BioScience (United States) (US), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Health and Well-being Studies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.