Using community health workers to assess the prevalence of dementia in a community based sample of older Zambians

Abstract Background In Zambia, dementia prevalence is unknown due to limited community awareness and a lack of providers skilled in recognizing and diagnosing this disease. Community healthcare workers (CHWs) are widely utilized across sub‐Saharan Africa to improve health care access, particularly HIV services. CHWs may be an untapped resource to raise awareness, screen for dementia, and support dementia care in the community. This study is piloting a community‐based model using CHWs to screen for dementia and associated risk factors in a population‐based sample of older Zambians. Methods Ten Zambian CHWs underwent a five‐day training led by a neuropsychologist and neurologist on symptoms of dementia, myths, and administration of the 10/66 dementia screening protocol. CHWs were then deployed in two high‐density Lusaka communities to enroll adults age >55 and a caregiver from randomly selected households. Demographics, medical history, diet, anthropomorphic measurements, HIV, and glucose testing were collected. Dementia was defined using the CSI‐D with a neuropsychologist regularly assessing community administration to assure standardization Results To date, 185 Zambians (mean age 67; 66% female, mean education 5.7yrs) have been enrolled. Mean household income was ZMW 1339 ($52/month). Fifty percent endorsed food insecurity in the past 30 days, whereas 25% drank alcohol. Twenty‐four (13%) participants were HIV‐positive. One hundred and two (55%) participants regularly attended community social activities. Caregivers reported that 13 (7%) participants regularly forgot family member’s names, 7 (4%) got lost in the community, and 5 (3%) got lost at home. On dementia screening, 63 (34%) screened negative for dementia (dfscore <0.12), 23 (12%) screened in the intermediate range (dfscore 0.12 to <0.184) and 99 (54%) participants screened positive for possible dementia (dfscore ≥0.184). Conclusions CHWs can be trained to reliably administer dementia screening measures and may serve as a resource for dementia care. High rates of positive dementia screening raise concern that these measures may be overly sensitive in this population. We are conducting additional neurological evaluation and neurocognitive testing with participants to assess CSI‐D sensitivity and specificity and to determine the prevalence of dementia and dementia risk factors in Zambia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092555
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using community health workers to assess the prevalence of dementia in a community based sample of older Zambians

David Daniel, Melissa A. Elafros, Linah K. Mwango, Jeremy A. Tanner et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Using community health workers to assess the prevalence of dementia in a community based sample of older Zambians

David Daniel, Melissa A. Elafros, Linah K. Mwango, Jeremy A. Tanner, Lisa Kalungwana, Chiti Bwalya, Lottie Hachaambwa, Coolwe Namangala, Faith Simushi, Leroy Yankae, Mataa M Mataa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In Zambia, dementia prevalence is unknown due to limited community awareness and a lack of providers skilled in recognizing and diagnosing this disease. Community healthcare workers (CHWs) are widely utilized across sub‐Saharan Africa to improve health care access, particularly HIV services. CHWs may be an untapped resource to raise awareness, screen for dementia, and support dementia care in the community. This study is piloting a community‐based model using CHWs to screen for dementia and associated risk factors in a population‐based sample of older Zambians. Methods Ten Zambian CHWs underwent a five‐day training led by a neuropsychologist and neurologist on symptoms of dementia, myths, and administration of the 10/66 dementia screening protocol. CHWs were then deployed in two high‐density Lusaka communities to enroll adults age >55 and a caregiver from randomly selected households. Demographics, medical history, diet, anthropomorphic measurements, HIV, and glucose testing were collected. Dementia was defined using the CSI‐D with a neuropsychologist regularly assessing community administration to assure standardization Results To date, 185 Zambians (mean age 67; 66% female, mean education 5.7yrs) have been enrolled. Mean household income was ZMW 1339 ($52/month). Fifty percent endorsed food insecurity in the past 30 days, whereas 25% drank alcohol. Twenty‐four (13%) participants were HIV‐positive. One hundred and two (55%) participants regularly attended community social activities. Caregivers reported that 13 (7%) participants regularly forgot family member’s names, 7 (4%) got lost in the community, and 5 (3%) got lost at home. On dementia screening, 63 (34%) screened negative for dementia (dfscore <0.12), 23 (12%) screened in the intermediate range (dfscore 0.12 to <0.184) and 99 (54%) participants screened positive for possible dementia (dfscore ≥0.184). Conclusions CHWs can be trained to reliably administer dementia screening measures and may serve as a resource for dementia care. High rates of positive dementia screening raise concern that these measures may be overly sensitive in this population. We are conducting additional neurological evaluation and neurocognitive testing with participants to assess CSI‐D sensitivity and specificity and to determine the prevalence of dementia and dementia risk factors in Zambia.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Michigan (US), University Teaching Hospital (ZM), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.