Differences in referral source across racial and ethnic groups at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers

Abstract Background Despite recognition of the need to increase underrepresented groups (URG) engagement in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) studies, enrollment remains low. As a first step in examining these disparities, these analyses aimed to compare referral sources for Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers (ADRC) enrollment of URG participants. Method These analyses included data from 48,330 participants across 46 ADRCs, obtained through the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set. Generalized logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association of racial/ethnic group and professional vs non‐professional referral source. The ‘professional’ category included referrals made by healthcare professionals or ADRC staff, while the ‘non‐professional’ category included referrals made by self, family or friends. This association was examined across the entire sample, and then individuals who had completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The analyses were adjusted for age, gender, education, visit year, and categorical CDR with random site effect to adjust for study site. Result Descriptive statistics are shown in Table 1. Non‐Hispanic Black and Asian participants were less likely to have completed an MRI. Across the entire sample, Non‐Hispanic Black and Non‐Hispanic Asian participants were less likely to be referred by a professional contact than Non‐Hispanic White participants (Table 2). In those who had completed an MRI, there were no significant differences across the racial groups, although we note that the sample sizes for those with MRI were much smaller (Table 3). Results for both analyses were similar when only participants who had a diagnosis of MCI or dementia and a global CDR of 0.5 or 1 at baseline were included. Conclusion One major factor leading to lower rates of URG participation in ADRD research is disproportionately fewer healthcare professional referrals. To develop and optimize ADRC recruitment strategies, future studies are needed to explore reasons for differences in URG referrals by healthcare professionals and non‐professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085999
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in referral source across racial and ethnic groups at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers

Sarah Biber, Shannon L. Risacher, Sophia Wang, Andrew J. Saykin et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Differences in referral source across racial and ethnic groups at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers

Sarah Biber, Shannon L. Risacher, Sophia Wang, Andrew J. Saykin, Sujuan Gao, Kathleen A. Lane, Omolola A. Adeoye‐Olatunde, Carol Chan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite recognition of the need to increase underrepresented groups (URG) engagement in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) studies, enrollment remains low. As a first step in examining these disparities, these analyses aimed to compare referral sources for Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers (ADRC) enrollment of URG participants. Method These analyses included data from 48,330 participants across 46 ADRCs, obtained through the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set. Generalized logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association of racial/ethnic group and professional vs non‐professional referral source. The ‘professional’ category included referrals made by healthcare professionals or ADRC staff, while the ‘non‐professional’ category included referrals made by self, family or friends. This association was examined across the entire sample, and then individuals who had completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The analyses were adjusted for age, gender, education, visit year, and categorical CDR with random site effect to adjust for study site. Result Descriptive statistics are shown in Table 1. Non‐Hispanic Black and Asian participants were less likely to have completed an MRI. Across the entire sample, Non‐Hispanic Black and Non‐Hispanic Asian participants were less likely to be referred by a professional contact than Non‐Hispanic White participants (Table 2). In those who had completed an MRI, there were no significant differences across the racial groups, although we note that the sample sizes for those with MRI were much smaller (Table 3). Results for both analyses were similar when only participants who had a diagnosis of MCI or dementia and a global CDR of 0.5 or 1 at baseline were included. Conclusion One major factor leading to lower rates of URG participation in ADRD research is disproportionately fewer healthcare professional referrals. To develop and optimize ADRC recruitment strategies, future studies are needed to explore reasons for differences in URG referrals by healthcare professionals and non‐professionals.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Washington (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University School (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.