Marital Status and living arrangements, Brain Reserve, and Cognitive Reserve Among Diverse Older Adults

Abstract Background Marital status is an important but often overlooked sociodemographic factor that could shape cognitive health in late adulthood. Being married is shown to be linked to lower risk of dementia, but less is understood about underlying mechanisms contributing to this relationship, such as brain reserve (BR) and cognitive reserve (CR). Further, less is known about how living arrangement, independent of marital status, is associated with late‐life cognition. The current study examines (1) associations between marital status, BR, and CR among diverse older adults and (2) whether living arrangement is linked to BR and CR among unmarried adults. Method Cross‐sectional data come from the Washington Heights‐Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP; N = 778, 41% Hispanic, 33% non‐Hispanic Black, 25% non‐Hispanic White; 64% women). Self‐reported marital status was categorized as currently married, previously married (i.e., divorced, separated, widowed), and never married. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of BR included regional cortical thickness (in Alzheimer’s disease signature regions), hippocampal volume, gray matter volume, and white matter hyperintensities. CR was defined as residual variance of an episodic memory composite after residualizing MRI markers. Exploratory analyses stratified by race and ethnicity and sex/gender. Age and education was controlled and physical health and income were explored as mediators. Result Marital status was associated with CR, but not BR, among White and Hispanic subgroups, and among women, such that those who were previously married had lower CR than their married counterparts. Never married women also had lower CR than married women. Among men only, marital status was associated with BR, but not CR, such that previously married men had lower gray matter volume than married men; however, this finding was not independent of income. Among currently unmarried individuals, living with others was not associated with greater BR nor CR. All findings were independent of age, education, and physical health. Conclusion Our findings show differential links between marital status and reserve mechanisms across race and ethnicity and sex/gender, underscoring the importance of examining marital status in older adult’s brain health. Future studies should examine other mechanisms that link marital dissolution and lower CR and nuanced contexts of marital history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092898
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marital Status and living arrangements, Brain Reserve, and Cognitive Reserve Among Diverse Older Adults

Adam M. Brickman, Afsara B. Zaheed, Ketlyne Sol, Laura B. Zahodne et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Marital Status and living arrangements, Brain Reserve, and Cognitive Reserve Among Diverse Older Adults

Adam M. Brickman, Afsara B. Zaheed, Ketlyne Sol, Laura B. Zahodne, Emily P. Morris, Ji Hyun Lee, Jordan D Palms, Jennifer J. Manly, Kiana A. Scambray
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Marital status is an important but often overlooked sociodemographic factor that could shape cognitive health in late adulthood. Being married is shown to be linked to lower risk of dementia, but less is understood about underlying mechanisms contributing to this relationship, such as brain reserve (BR) and cognitive reserve (CR). Further, less is known about how living arrangement, independent of marital status, is associated with late‐life cognition. The current study examines (1) associations between marital status, BR, and CR among diverse older adults and (2) whether living arrangement is linked to BR and CR among unmarried adults. Method Cross‐sectional data come from the Washington Heights‐Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP; N = 778, 41% Hispanic, 33% non‐Hispanic Black, 25% non‐Hispanic White; 64% women). Self‐reported marital status was categorized as currently married, previously married (i.e., divorced, separated, widowed), and never married. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of BR included regional cortical thickness (in Alzheimer’s disease signature regions), hippocampal volume, gray matter volume, and white matter hyperintensities. CR was defined as residual variance of an episodic memory composite after residualizing MRI markers. Exploratory analyses stratified by race and ethnicity and sex/gender. Age and education was controlled and physical health and income were explored as mediators. Result Marital status was associated with CR, but not BR, among White and Hispanic subgroups, and among women, such that those who were previously married had lower CR than their married counterparts. Never married women also had lower CR than married women. Among men only, marital status was associated with BR, but not CR, such that previously married men had lower gray matter volume than married men; however, this finding was not independent of income. Among currently unmarried individuals, living with others was not associated with greater BR nor CR. All findings were independent of age, education, and physical health. Conclusion Our findings show differential links between marital status and reserve mechanisms across race and ethnicity and sex/gender, underscoring the importance of examining marital status in older adult’s brain health. Future studies should examine other mechanisms that link marital dissolution and lower CR and nuanced contexts of marital history.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Montana State University (US), University of Michigan (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.