Psychometric properties of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) adapted for cognitive screening

Abstract Background Context‐specific measures with high content validity are needed to adequately determine psychosocial effects related to screening for cognitive impairment. The objective of this investigation was to examine psychometric properties of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ), a measure of psychological impact of medical screening, adapted for cognitive screening in primary care. Methods Two‐hundred adults aged ≥65 recently completing routine, standardized cognitive screening as part of their Medicare Annual Wellness Visit were administered the adapted PCQ measure, comprised of negative (PCQ‐Neg) and positive (PCQ‐Pos) scales. Measure distribution, acceptability, internal consistency, factor structure, and content validity (construct, discriminative, criterion) were analyzed. Results Participants had a mean age of 73.3, were primarily female and socioeconomically advantaged. Nearly all received a normal cognitive screening result (99.5%). Overall PCQ scores were low (PCQ‐Neg: M 1.27; PCQ‐Pos: M 7.63). Both scales demonstrated floor effects. Acceptability was satisfactory, although the PCQ‐Pos had slightly more item missingness. Both scales had Cronbach alpha’s >0.80 and a single factor structure. Spearman correlations between the PCQ‐Neg with general measures of psychological distress ranged from 0.26 to 0.37 (p’s <0.001); correlation with a measure of well‐being was ‐0.19 (p<0.01). The PCQ‐Neg discriminated between those with and without a subjective cognitive complaint (M 2.73 vs. 0.89, p <0.001), and was associated with medical visit satisfaction (r = ‐0.24, p<0.001). The PCQ‐Pos predicted willingness for future screening (M 8.00 vs 3.00, p = 0.03). Conclusions The adapted PCQ‐Neg scale is an overall valid measure of negative psychological consequences of cognitive screening; findings for the PCQ‐Pos scale were more variable. Future studies are needed to further understand PCQ performance among more diverse samples and those with abnormal test results following cognitive screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090010
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) adapted for cognitive screening

Sarah Filec, Michael S. Wolf, Mary Kwasny, Rebecca Lovett et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Psychometric properties of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) adapted for cognitive screening

Sarah Filec, Michael S. Wolf, Mary Kwasny, Rebecca Lovett, Stephen D. Persell, Katherine L. Possin, Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Jeimmy Hurtado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Context‐specific measures with high content validity are needed to adequately determine psychosocial effects related to screening for cognitive impairment. The objective of this investigation was to examine psychometric properties of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ), a measure of psychological impact of medical screening, adapted for cognitive screening in primary care. Methods Two‐hundred adults aged ≥65 recently completing routine, standardized cognitive screening as part of their Medicare Annual Wellness Visit were administered the adapted PCQ measure, comprised of negative (PCQ‐Neg) and positive (PCQ‐Pos) scales. Measure distribution, acceptability, internal consistency, factor structure, and content validity (construct, discriminative, criterion) were analyzed. Results Participants had a mean age of 73.3, were primarily female and socioeconomically advantaged. Nearly all received a normal cognitive screening result (99.5%). Overall PCQ scores were low (PCQ‐Neg: M 1.27; PCQ‐Pos: M 7.63). Both scales demonstrated floor effects. Acceptability was satisfactory, although the PCQ‐Pos had slightly more item missingness. Both scales had Cronbach alpha’s >0.80 and a single factor structure. Spearman correlations between the PCQ‐Neg with general measures of psychological distress ranged from 0.26 to 0.37 (p’s <0.001); correlation with a measure of well‐being was ‐0.19 (p<0.01). The PCQ‐Neg discriminated between those with and without a subjective cognitive complaint (M 2.73 vs. 0.89, p <0.001), and was associated with medical visit satisfaction (r = ‐0.24, p<0.001). The PCQ‐Pos predicted willingness for future screening (M 8.00 vs 3.00, p = 0.03). Conclusions The adapted PCQ‐Neg scale is an overall valid measure of negative psychological consequences of cognitive screening; findings for the PCQ‐Pos scale were more variable. Future studies are needed to further understand PCQ performance among more diverse samples and those with abnormal test results following cognitive screening.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Northwestern University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.