Evaluating Sociodemographic Bias in an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Electronic Health Records

Abstract Background Underdiagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) leads to lost opportunities for timely intervention, increased healthcare costs, and underestimation of the true burden of disease. To address this problem, we developed an AI algorithm, Decipher‐AI ( DE tection of C ognitive I mpairment PH enotypes in EHR), to screen primary care patients for undiagnosed cognitive impairment (CI). We evaluated performance across sociodemographic groups using 3 years of EHR data before the first diagnosis or most recent visit. Method Decipher‐AI employs a two‐level hierarchical model, consisting of a large language model (LLM) to generate latent representations from unstructured clinical text and a patient‐level model that combines these representations with structured EHR data to predict the probability of CI (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00). Decipher‐AI was evaluated on a test set comprising 22,000 Mass General Brigham primary care patients aged 65 years or older. The selection process involved stratified random sampling across distinct racial/ethnic strata to ensure representation of diverse sociodemographic factors (Table 1). Cognitive status labels were determined based on the presence of dementia‐related diagnosis codes, while sociodemographic status was measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Result The AUC on the validation dataset was 0.80 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.81]; sensitivity was 0.75 [0.74, 0.77] and specificity 0.68 [0.67, 0.69], at the threshold of maximum accuracy. There were no significant differences in AUCs across sex or race/ethnic subgroups, but AUC was lower for patients under 75 years. (Figure 1A). Notably, Decipher‐AI exhibited diminished performance in patients from more disadvantaged neighborhoods (Figure 1B). Further analysis revealed that these disparities were associated with fewer encounters, outpatient visits, and notes containing cognition‐related keywords in patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods (Table 2). Conclusion Our study highlights the potential of Decipher‐AI for screening undiagnosed cognitive impairment in primary care. Nevertheless, disparities in algorithm performance underscore the importance of addressing sociodemographic inequities in EHR data. In the future, systematic tailored screening in primary care via standardized questionnaires coupled with AI‐assisted chart reviews, has the potential to address the underdiagnosis of ADRD in an equitable manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093404
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Sociodemographic Bias in an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Electronic Health Records

Colin Magdamo, Deborah Blacker, Michael Brandon Westover, Christine S. Ritchie et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Machine Learning in Healthcare
0.35
article

Evaluating Sociodemographic Bias in an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Electronic Health Records

Colin Magdamo, Deborah Blacker, Michael Brandon Westover, Christine S. Ritchie, Sudeshna Das, Bradley T. Hyman, John R. Dickson, Tanish Tyagi, Shibani S. Mukerji, Yignan He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Underdiagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) leads to lost opportunities for timely intervention, increased healthcare costs, and underestimation of the true burden of disease. To address this problem, we developed an AI algorithm, Decipher‐AI ( DE tection of C ognitive I mpairment PH enotypes in EHR), to screen primary care patients for undiagnosed cognitive impairment (CI). We evaluated performance across sociodemographic groups using 3 years of EHR data before the first diagnosis or most recent visit. Method Decipher‐AI employs a two‐level hierarchical model, consisting of a large language model (LLM) to generate latent representations from unstructured clinical text and a patient‐level model that combines these representations with structured EHR data to predict the probability of CI (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00). Decipher‐AI was evaluated on a test set comprising 22,000 Mass General Brigham primary care patients aged 65 years or older. The selection process involved stratified random sampling across distinct racial/ethnic strata to ensure representation of diverse sociodemographic factors (Table 1). Cognitive status labels were determined based on the presence of dementia‐related diagnosis codes, while sociodemographic status was measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Result The AUC on the validation dataset was 0.80 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.81]; sensitivity was 0.75 [0.74, 0.77] and specificity 0.68 [0.67, 0.69], at the threshold of maximum accuracy. There were no significant differences in AUCs across sex or race/ethnic subgroups, but AUC was lower for patients under 75 years. (Figure 1A). Notably, Decipher‐AI exhibited diminished performance in patients from more disadvantaged neighborhoods (Figure 1B). Further analysis revealed that these disparities were associated with fewer encounters, outpatient visits, and notes containing cognition‐related keywords in patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods (Table 2). Conclusion Our study highlights the potential of Decipher‐AI for screening undiagnosed cognitive impairment in primary care. Nevertheless, disparities in algorithm performance underscore the importance of addressing sociodemographic inequities in EHR data. In the future, systematic tailored screening in primary care via standardized questionnaires coupled with AI‐assisted chart reviews, has the potential to address the underdiagnosis of ADRD in an equitable manner.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.