Cross‐Culturally Translating and Validating a Dementia Attitudes Scale in Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Greek

Abstract Background Dementia is highly stigmatised, misperceived as a mental illness, and considered a normal part of ageing by people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in Australia. There is a lack of valid and reliable scale to measure their dementia attitudes. This study aimed to cross‐culturally translate and validate a dementia attitudes scale in Arabic, Vietnamese, Chinese, and Greek communities as they represent the main languages spoken throughout Western Sydney, Australia. Method A 12‐item Australian dementia attitudes scale, initially adapted from the PRISM‐PC–Dementia Screening Subscale, underwent forward and backward translation in the Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Greek languages with certified translators and bilingual project team members. The translated surveys were also piloted with native speaking older community members to resolve comprehension issues. The final version of each scale was distributed online and at community events. Scale data (Arabic N = 197; Vietnamese N = 121; Cantonese N = 107; Mandarin N = 219; Greek N = 1,050) underwent reliability testing (Cronbach’s α) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and Promax rotation. Result The translated scales demonstrated high reliability across all five language groups (Cronbach α ≥ .77). The EFAs revealed distinct factor solutions for the Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, and Mandarin scales, with ‘fear of labelling’ emerging as a common stigma‐related factor. Ten of the twelve items in the Greek scale did not meet retention criteria, limiting the scale’s validity. Conclusion The cross‐cultural translation procedures yielded reliable scale outcomes across the five languages. The distinct factor solutions for each scale highlight the impact of culture on the stigma toward dementia. These scales can help researchers and community organisations efficiently explore dementia attitudes in under‐served populations and tailor education programs to combat misperceptions. However, a more robust scale for the Greek speaking community needs to be developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091704
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross‐Culturally Translating and Validating a Dementia Attitudes Scale in Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Greek

Kim‐Huong Nguyen, Sonia Chan, Eman Shatnawi, Joyce Siette et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health and Wellbeing Research
0.85
article

Cross‐Culturally Translating and Validating a Dementia Attitudes Scale in Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Greek

Kim‐Huong Nguyen, Sonia Chan, Eman Shatnawi, Joyce Siette, Genevieve Z. Steiner, Diana Karamacoska, Nibras Jasim, Mai Thi Ngoc Tran, Gabriela E. Caballero, Hanh Dao Tran, Eliza Chan, Emy Tsouros
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Dementia is highly stigmatised, misperceived as a mental illness, and considered a normal part of ageing by people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in Australia. There is a lack of valid and reliable scale to measure their dementia attitudes. This study aimed to cross‐culturally translate and validate a dementia attitudes scale in Arabic, Vietnamese, Chinese, and Greek communities as they represent the main languages spoken throughout Western Sydney, Australia. Method A 12‐item Australian dementia attitudes scale, initially adapted from the PRISM‐PC–Dementia Screening Subscale, underwent forward and backward translation in the Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Greek languages with certified translators and bilingual project team members. The translated surveys were also piloted with native speaking older community members to resolve comprehension issues. The final version of each scale was distributed online and at community events. Scale data (Arabic N = 197; Vietnamese N = 121; Cantonese N = 107; Mandarin N = 219; Greek N = 1,050) underwent reliability testing (Cronbach’s α) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and Promax rotation. Result The translated scales demonstrated high reliability across all five language groups (Cronbach α ≥ .77). The EFAs revealed distinct factor solutions for the Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese, and Mandarin scales, with ‘fear of labelling’ emerging as a common stigma‐related factor. Ten of the twelve items in the Greek scale did not meet retention criteria, limiting the scale’s validity. Conclusion The cross‐cultural translation procedures yielded reliable scale outcomes across the five languages. The distinct factor solutions for each scale highlight the impact of culture on the stigma toward dementia. These scales can help researchers and community organisations efficiently explore dementia attitudes in under‐served populations and tailor education programs to combat misperceptions. However, a more robust scale for the Greek speaking community needs to be developed.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Translational Research Institute (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Health and Wellbeing Research
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.