The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI): a novel, disease‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure for use in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials and patient monitoring

Abstract Background To bolster clinical trial infrastructure, there is a need to develop novel, valid, and reliable patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures capable of tracking clinically‐relevant changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia over time. This research describes the development and validation of the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI) as a tool to measure how patients feel and function in response to therapeutic intervention. Method We previously conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews and a national cross‐sectional study with individuals with AD, MCI and dementia to ascertain the most prevalent and impactful symptoms identified by the participants. This data was used to generate the first version of the AD‐HI. We then conducted beta testing of the AD‐HI with individuals with AD and MCI to determine the instrument’s comprehensibility, ease of use, and applicability to the AD and MCI populations. Following participant feedback, we further modified the instrument and conducted test‐retest reliability, known groups validity ( Figure 1 ), area under the curve (AUC) analysis ( Figure 2 ), and factor analysis to validate the AD‐HI. Result Fifteen individuals with AD and MCI participated in the qualitative interviews and 104 individuals participated in the cross‐sectional study. We conducted beta testing with an additional 15 individuals with AD and MCI who stated that the AD‐HI was easy to use, clear, and highly relevant. Twenty‐three individuals with AD, MCI and dementia participated in test‐retest analysis. Known groups analysis demonstrated that the AD‐HI was able to differentiate between subgroups with varying levels of disease burden (based on employment status, disability status and those experiencing seizures). Conclusion The AD‐HI is a valid and reliable regulatory‐grade instrument capable of measuring multifaceted disease burden in AD, MCI and dementia. The development, optimization and validation of the AD‐HI provides researchers and clinicians with a disease‐specific PRO for use in therapeutic trials and to potentially support FDA drug‐labeling claims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085604
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI): a novel, disease‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure for use in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials and patient monitoring

Charlotte Engebrecht
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI): a novel, disease‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure for use in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials and patient monitoring

Charlotte Engebrecht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To bolster clinical trial infrastructure, there is a need to develop novel, valid, and reliable patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures capable of tracking clinically‐relevant changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia over time. This research describes the development and validation of the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI) as a tool to measure how patients feel and function in response to therapeutic intervention. Method We previously conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews and a national cross‐sectional study with individuals with AD, MCI and dementia to ascertain the most prevalent and impactful symptoms identified by the participants. This data was used to generate the first version of the AD‐HI. We then conducted beta testing of the AD‐HI with individuals with AD and MCI to determine the instrument’s comprehensibility, ease of use, and applicability to the AD and MCI populations. Following participant feedback, we further modified the instrument and conducted test‐retest reliability, known groups validity ( Figure 1 ), area under the curve (AUC) analysis ( Figure 2 ), and factor analysis to validate the AD‐HI. Result Fifteen individuals with AD and MCI participated in the qualitative interviews and 104 individuals participated in the cross‐sectional study. We conducted beta testing with an additional 15 individuals with AD and MCI who stated that the AD‐HI was easy to use, clear, and highly relevant. Twenty‐three individuals with AD, MCI and dementia participated in test‐retest analysis. Known groups analysis demonstrated that the AD‐HI was able to differentiate between subgroups with varying levels of disease burden (based on employment status, disability status and those experiencing seizures). Conclusion The AD‐HI is a valid and reliable regulatory‐grade instrument capable of measuring multifaceted disease burden in AD, MCI and dementia. The development, optimization and validation of the AD‐HI provides researchers and clinicians with a disease‐specific PRO for use in therapeutic trials and to potentially support FDA drug‐labeling claims.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.