An RCT assessing the effects of varying exposure times of therapeutic communication robots on dementia in group homes in Japan

Abstract Background As Japan experiences a super‐ageing society and caregiver manpower decreases, interest in the use of communication robots for active dementia care rises. In the U.S., the communication robot (PARO) has been used as a medical device for psychophysiological biofeedback therapy. We report the effects of varying the exposure time for (PARO) on BPSD severity in people with dementia and on the caregivers' burden of professional caregivers in group homes. Methods Cluster randomized controlled trial design. Group homes were randomly assigned to two groups, one using (PARO) once a week and the other thrice a week for one hour per session. For the intervention, (PARO) was placed on a table in a communal area, and participants interacted freely with (PARO). The caregivers provided no encouragement. Changes in BPSD severity and caregivers' burden before and after the intervention were compared using a linear mixed model. The primary outcomes were the severity score and caregivers' burden score of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory brief Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). Results Ninety‐one participants were recruited, 85 were included in the analysis. The thrice‐weekly group showed improvement in severity scores before and after the intervention, but there was no statistically significant difference between the once‐weekly and thrice‐weekly groups. The caregivers' burden score was significantly improved in the thrice‐weekly group compared to the once‐weekly group. Conclusions Using (PARO) once a week for 1 month did not have a significant effect on either severity or caregivers' burden, whereas thrice a week contributed to reducing caregivers' burden. The effect was better scored on the severity in the thrice‐weekly group than that in the once‐a‐week group, but the difference was not statistically significant, suggesting the need to revisit this issue with a longer intervention period. The impact on caregivers may be evident after a relatively short period. The introduction of (PARO) potentially reduces caregivers’ burden and helps to improve the quality of care, hence providing operational support to group homes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087203
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An RCT assessing the effects of varying exposure times of therapeutic communication robots on dementia in group homes in Japan

Takanori Shibata, Mitsunobu Kono, Chiyomi Yatsu, Masahiro Shigeta et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

An RCT assessing the effects of varying exposure times of therapeutic communication robots on dementia in group homes in Japan

Takanori Shibata, Mitsunobu Kono, Chiyomi Yatsu, Masahiro Shigeta, Daryl Patrick Yao, Kaoru Inoue, Ryuji Kobayashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background As Japan experiences a super‐ageing society and caregiver manpower decreases, interest in the use of communication robots for active dementia care rises. In the U.S., the communication robot (PARO) has been used as a medical device for psychophysiological biofeedback therapy. We report the effects of varying the exposure time for (PARO) on BPSD severity in people with dementia and on the caregivers' burden of professional caregivers in group homes. Methods Cluster randomized controlled trial design. Group homes were randomly assigned to two groups, one using (PARO) once a week and the other thrice a week for one hour per session. For the intervention, (PARO) was placed on a table in a communal area, and participants interacted freely with (PARO). The caregivers provided no encouragement. Changes in BPSD severity and caregivers' burden before and after the intervention were compared using a linear mixed model. The primary outcomes were the severity score and caregivers' burden score of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory brief Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). Results Ninety‐one participants were recruited, 85 were included in the analysis. The thrice‐weekly group showed improvement in severity scores before and after the intervention, but there was no statistically significant difference between the once‐weekly and thrice‐weekly groups. The caregivers' burden score was significantly improved in the thrice‐weekly group compared to the once‐weekly group. Conclusions Using (PARO) once a week for 1 month did not have a significant effect on either severity or caregivers' burden, whereas thrice a week contributed to reducing caregivers' burden. The effect was better scored on the severity in the thrice‐weekly group than that in the once‐a‐week group, but the difference was not statistically significant, suggesting the need to revisit this issue with a longer intervention period. The impact on caregivers may be evident after a relatively short period. The introduction of (PARO) potentially reduces caregivers’ burden and helps to improve the quality of care, hence providing operational support to group homes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Kinjo University (JP), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP), Hyogo University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.