Teisėjų padėjėjų profesinio saviveiksmingumo ir psichologinės gerovės ryšys

Judicial assistants have been gaining more and more legal expertise and practice in handling disputes. However, the professional role of judicial assistants has not been researched in Lithuania yet. The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between the professional self-efficacy and psychological well-being of judicial assistants. Firstly, the conflicts in role of judicial assistants and work uncertainties have been identified. Secondly, the professional self-efficacy of judicial assistants is best predicted by satisfaction with interpersonal relationships and perceived value at work. In turn, perceived value at work is best predicted by satisfaction with interpersonal relationships, job satisfaction, and an increasing seniority. These results have been received after conducting a survey of 269 judicial assistants working in Lithuanian courts. The Additional Lithuanian Psychological Well-Being Scale (LPGS-P) was used to assess psychological well-being, whereas the short version of the Professional Self-Efficacy Scale (OCCSEFF) developed by Schyns and von Collani (2002) was employed to assess professional self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teisė
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2024.133.6
Primary Topic
Research in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teisėjų padėjėjų profesinio saviveiksmingumo ir psichologinės gerovės ryšys

Svajunė Tylaitė, Dovilė Barysė, Simona Bareikytė
Teisė
Research in Social Sciences
article

Teisėjų padėjėjų profesinio saviveiksmingumo ir psichologinės gerovės ryšys

Svajunė Tylaitė, Dovilė Barysė, Simona Bareikytė
article en

Abstract

Judicial assistants have been gaining more and more legal expertise and practice in handling disputes. However, the professional role of judicial assistants has not been researched in Lithuania yet. The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between the professional self-efficacy and psychological well-being of judicial assistants. Firstly, the conflicts in role of judicial assistants and work uncertainties have been identified. Secondly, the professional self-efficacy of judicial assistants is best predicted by satisfaction with interpersonal relationships and perceived value at work. In turn, perceived value at work is best predicted by satisfaction with interpersonal relationships, job satisfaction, and an increasing seniority. These results have been received after conducting a survey of 269 judicial assistants working in Lithuanian courts. The Additional Lithuanian Psychological Well-Being Scale (LPGS-P) was used to assess psychological well-being, whereas the short version of the Professional Self-Efficacy Scale (OCCSEFF) developed by Schyns and von Collani (2002) was employed to assess professional self-efficacy.

TeisėVol. 133
Vilnius University (LT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Research in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.