Informing the design of embedded pragmatic trials of dementia care interventions: perspectives from a Lived Experience Panel

Abstract Background The National Institute on Aging (NIA) Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Related Dementia (AD/ADRD) Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory, in partnership with the Alzheimer’s Association, convened a Lived Experience Panel (LEP), a group of 9‐12 individuals, including people living with cognitive symptoms, proxies representing people with an advanced cognitive disorder or who are deceased, and care partners of a person living with dementia. The aim was for the LEP members to share their experiences with research, inform the development of research priorities, and provide input on conducting embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) of dementia care interventions. Given the importance of providing a space for people with lived experiences to share their thoughts and recommendations, we continue to report on the final stage of LEP in its original design. Method The recruitment and selection process, as well as the initial convening of the LEP have been reported in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Since that publication, two additional panel series have concluded. In the recent series, the LEP addressed the intersections of dementia care interventions on the topics of health equity and goal‐concordant care. Summary reports of the LEP meetings are available on the IMPACT website. Currently the LEP is convening for a series to assess LEP members’ changes in perspectives about research as a result of participating in the LEP activities. In addition, the current series will gather their recommendations for improvement on the LEP as a model to improve ePCTs. Result One summary report was released, titled, “Voices of the Lived Experience Panel: Health Equity in Dementia Care and Research” and one summary report related to goal‐concordant care is in progress. Panelists identified the importance of recognizing diversity of diagnoses within AD/ADRD, as well as discussing opportunities and limitations of evaluating goal‐concordant care for people living with cognitive symptoms and their care partners. Conclusion IMPACT’s LEP provides a model for the collaborative engagement of people with lived experiences related to dementia. Results from the LEP reports should be widely shared with the dementia research community to promote further work of including people with lived experiences as research partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086463
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informing the design of embedded pragmatic trials of dementia care interventions: perspectives from a Lived Experience Panel

Yaideliz M. Romero-Ramos, Gary Epstein‐Lubow, Katherine Brandt, Monica Moreno et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Informing the design of embedded pragmatic trials of dementia care interventions: perspectives from a Lived Experience Panel

Yaideliz M. Romero-Ramos, Gary Epstein‐Lubow, Katherine Brandt, Monica Moreno, Carolyn Marino Malone
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The National Institute on Aging (NIA) Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Related Dementia (AD/ADRD) Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory, in partnership with the Alzheimer’s Association, convened a Lived Experience Panel (LEP), a group of 9‐12 individuals, including people living with cognitive symptoms, proxies representing people with an advanced cognitive disorder or who are deceased, and care partners of a person living with dementia. The aim was for the LEP members to share their experiences with research, inform the development of research priorities, and provide input on conducting embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) of dementia care interventions. Given the importance of providing a space for people with lived experiences to share their thoughts and recommendations, we continue to report on the final stage of LEP in its original design. Method The recruitment and selection process, as well as the initial convening of the LEP have been reported in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Since that publication, two additional panel series have concluded. In the recent series, the LEP addressed the intersections of dementia care interventions on the topics of health equity and goal‐concordant care. Summary reports of the LEP meetings are available on the IMPACT website. Currently the LEP is convening for a series to assess LEP members’ changes in perspectives about research as a result of participating in the LEP activities. In addition, the current series will gather their recommendations for improvement on the LEP as a model to improve ePCTs. Result One summary report was released, titled, “Voices of the Lived Experience Panel: Health Equity in Dementia Care and Research” and one summary report related to goal‐concordant care is in progress. Panelists identified the importance of recognizing diversity of diagnoses within AD/ADRD, as well as discussing opportunities and limitations of evaluating goal‐concordant care for people living with cognitive symptoms and their care partners. Conclusion IMPACT’s LEP provides a model for the collaborative engagement of people with lived experiences related to dementia. Results from the LEP reports should be widely shared with the dementia research community to promote further work of including people with lived experiences as research partners.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Brown University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.