Emergency Department Experiences of People Living with Dementia

Abstract Background Over half of the 6 million persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the United States visit emergency departments (EDs) annually. Because EDs play a vital role in providing care to PLWD, there has been increased attention to improving the ED care experience. Yet, measures to evaluate the ED care experience for PLWD focus predominantly on care utilization or distal outcomes (e.g., ED revisit, mortality) and may not adequately address aspects of the ED care experience itself or what matters most to PLWD during ED visits. To address this gap, this study aims to identify care priorities of PLWD during ED visits to inform the development of a Person‐Centered Outcome Measure for use by PLWD to facilitate evaluation of those priorities. Methods This presentation will discuss findings from interviews with PLWD and care partners of PLWD during ED encounters which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Descriptive findings were categorized into one of four inductively‐derived evaluation domains, from which preliminarily evaluation questions were developed. Results Interviews were conducted with 31 participants, consisting of 15 care partners, 10 PLWD, and 3 dyads (Table 1). Descriptive findings reported by both PLWD and care partners emphasized their priorities for ED care, including the importance of being informed about the care and testing they received, knowing the roles of those on their care teams, and feeling that their goals for care were addressed. Some PLWD and care partners evaluated domains differently; i.e., overall evaluated ED experience positively but goals of care were not met. Table 2 presents the evaluation domains derived through analysis and preliminary questions designed to facilitate evaluation of these domains. Conclusions Findings demonstrate that evaluation of ED care experiences is complex and multi‐faceted, and emphasize that assessment strategies are needed that target multiple domains of the experience including goal alignment, approach to care, and overall perception of experience. Findings indicate PLWD and care partners value feeling informed in the ED, and many cite the importance of being aware of the impact of cognition. Evaluations of the ED experience differs between PLWD and care partners, and by stage of dementia, requiring further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.084586
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency Department Experiences of People Living with Dementia

Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi, Laura Block
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Emergency Department Experiences of People Living with Dementia

Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi, Laura Block
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Over half of the 6 million persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the United States visit emergency departments (EDs) annually. Because EDs play a vital role in providing care to PLWD, there has been increased attention to improving the ED care experience. Yet, measures to evaluate the ED care experience for PLWD focus predominantly on care utilization or distal outcomes (e.g., ED revisit, mortality) and may not adequately address aspects of the ED care experience itself or what matters most to PLWD during ED visits. To address this gap, this study aims to identify care priorities of PLWD during ED visits to inform the development of a Person‐Centered Outcome Measure for use by PLWD to facilitate evaluation of those priorities. Methods This presentation will discuss findings from interviews with PLWD and care partners of PLWD during ED encounters which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Descriptive findings were categorized into one of four inductively‐derived evaluation domains, from which preliminarily evaluation questions were developed. Results Interviews were conducted with 31 participants, consisting of 15 care partners, 10 PLWD, and 3 dyads (Table 1). Descriptive findings reported by both PLWD and care partners emphasized their priorities for ED care, including the importance of being informed about the care and testing they received, knowing the roles of those on their care teams, and feeling that their goals for care were addressed. Some PLWD and care partners evaluated domains differently; i.e., overall evaluated ED experience positively but goals of care were not met. Table 2 presents the evaluation domains derived through analysis and preliminary questions designed to facilitate evaluation of these domains. Conclusions Findings demonstrate that evaluation of ED care experiences is complex and multi‐faceted, and emphasize that assessment strategies are needed that target multiple domains of the experience including goal alignment, approach to care, and overall perception of experience. Findings indicate PLWD and care partners value feeling informed in the ED, and many cite the importance of being aware of the impact of cognition. Evaluations of the ED experience differs between PLWD and care partners, and by stage of dementia, requiring further investigation.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S4)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.