Assessing the social impacts of fisheries decline on fishing communities

The depletion and degradation of Common Pool Resources (CPR) has been a major concern for development theorists and policymakers in recent decades. In countries like India, where the great majority of rural poor people depend on resources like pastures, forests, groundwater, and others to sustain themselves, this is particularly true (Jodha 1990). However, two of the most crucial elements when it comes to shared resources are governance and selecting the appropriate organizations to manage them. Social scientists, particularly mainstream economists, have been debating this issue extensively. Some people think that the state is the best alternative when market systems don't work, while others think that privatization is the only solution. It should be noted that, up until the 1980s, most academics believed that the people who used these resources couldn't organize themselves to manage them, thus they suggested that the government or private sector should be imposed. These discussions frequently make the assumption that the lines between the public, private, and communal types of resource tenure are clearly established.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70102/ijares/v4s1/13
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Economic Development in India
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the social impacts of fisheries decline on fishing communities

Ritu Talwar, Ankita Nihlani, Savita Gautam, Jainish Roy
1 citations
International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies
Social and Economic Development in India
1.13
article

Assessing the social impacts of fisheries decline on fishing communities

Ritu Talwar, Ankita Nihlani, Savita Gautam, Jainish Roy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The depletion and degradation of Common Pool Resources (CPR) has been a major concern for development theorists and policymakers in recent decades. In countries like India, where the great majority of rural poor people depend on resources like pastures, forests, groundwater, and others to sustain themselves, this is particularly true (Jodha 1990). However, two of the most crucial elements when it comes to shared resources are governance and selecting the appropriate organizations to manage them. Social scientists, particularly mainstream economists, have been debating this issue extensively. Some people think that the state is the best alternative when market systems don't work, while others think that privatization is the only solution. It should be noted that, up until the 1980s, most academics believed that the people who used these resources couldn't organize themselves to manage them, thus they suggested that the government or private sector should be imposed. These discussions frequently make the assumption that the lines between the public, private, and communal types of resource tenure are clearly established.

International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental StudiesVol. 4(S1)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Social and Economic Development in India
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.