Structure‐activity relationship study of neuroprotective complex I inhibitor CP2

Abstract Background We identified small molecule tricyclic pyrone compound CP2 as a mild mitochondrial complex I (MCI) inhibitor that induces neuroprotection in multiple mouse models of AD. One of the major concerns while targeting mitochondria is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). CP2 consists of two diastereoisomers, D1 and D2, with distinct activity and toxicity profiles. This study was designed to understand how structure of D1 and D2 affects their binding to MCI and the consequential impact on ROS production. Method The X‐ray crystallography and cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) at global resolution of 3.25‐3.27Å were employed to identify the molecular structure of D1 and D2 and the D1 binding to the isolated ovine MCI. The assessment of the MCI inhibition and the extent of ROS generation were done in isolated MCI and human neuroblastoma MC65 cells using flow cytometry, a Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer, and the kinetic studies. Result In the closed conformation of MCI, D1 selectively binds to the deep Quinone‐site (Q d ) but not to the shallow Q‐site (Q s ), sharing the same binding pocket as rotenone. In the open MCI state, D1 exclusively binds to the Q s in contrast to rotenone, which binds Q d and Q s in both closed and open states. At the same concentrations, D1 inhibits respiration to a greater extent compared to D2 (5:1 ratio) and produces higher level of ROS. Conclusion Cryo‐EM unambiguously identified binding of D1 to both the Q d and Q s sites, contingent upon the conformational state of MCI. In contrast to rotenone, D1 binds Q d only in the closed conformation during catalytic cycle, leading to mild inhibition. Superimposing X‐ray crystallography data of D1 and D2 onto cryo‐EM data suggests that the orientation of the methyl group in D2 induces a flatter conformation, resulting in lower binding affinity to MCI, which correlates with lower inhibition and toxicity compared to D1. At physiologically relevant concentrations, CP2 (D1:D2 = 1:1) demonstrates low MCI inhibition yielding negligible ROS levels. This observation provides new insight into the absence of toxicity associated with CP2 treatment in vivo , further highlighting feasibility for the development of safe and efficacious MCI inhibitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085971
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure‐activity relationship study of neuroprotective complex I inhibitor CP2

Matthew J. Schellenberg, Eugenia Trushina, Mark Ostroot, Leonid A. Sazanov et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Structure‐activity relationship study of neuroprotective complex I inhibitor CP2

Matthew J. Schellenberg, Eugenia Trushina, Mark Ostroot, Leonid A. Sazanov, Olga A. Petrova, Thi Kim Oanh Nguyen, Graham David Johnson, Sergey A. Trushin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We identified small molecule tricyclic pyrone compound CP2 as a mild mitochondrial complex I (MCI) inhibitor that induces neuroprotection in multiple mouse models of AD. One of the major concerns while targeting mitochondria is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). CP2 consists of two diastereoisomers, D1 and D2, with distinct activity and toxicity profiles. This study was designed to understand how structure of D1 and D2 affects their binding to MCI and the consequential impact on ROS production. Method The X‐ray crystallography and cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) at global resolution of 3.25‐3.27Å were employed to identify the molecular structure of D1 and D2 and the D1 binding to the isolated ovine MCI. The assessment of the MCI inhibition and the extent of ROS generation were done in isolated MCI and human neuroblastoma MC65 cells using flow cytometry, a Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer, and the kinetic studies. Result In the closed conformation of MCI, D1 selectively binds to the deep Quinone‐site (Q d ) but not to the shallow Q‐site (Q s ), sharing the same binding pocket as rotenone. In the open MCI state, D1 exclusively binds to the Q s in contrast to rotenone, which binds Q d and Q s in both closed and open states. At the same concentrations, D1 inhibits respiration to a greater extent compared to D2 (5:1 ratio) and produces higher level of ROS. Conclusion Cryo‐EM unambiguously identified binding of D1 to both the Q d and Q s sites, contingent upon the conformational state of MCI. In contrast to rotenone, D1 binds Q d only in the closed conformation during catalytic cycle, leading to mild inhibition. Superimposing X‐ray crystallography data of D1 and D2 onto cryo‐EM data suggests that the orientation of the methyl group in D2 induces a flatter conformation, resulting in lower binding affinity to MCI, which correlates with lower inhibition and toxicity compared to D1. At physiologically relevant concentrations, CP2 (D1:D2 = 1:1) demonstrates low MCI inhibition yielding negligible ROS levels. This observation provides new insight into the absence of toxicity associated with CP2 treatment in vivo , further highlighting feasibility for the development of safe and efficacious MCI inhibitors.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
Mayo Clinic (US), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.