Mechanistic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Progression: Linking Amyloid and Tau Pathologies

Abstract Background Recent anti‐amyloid mAb trial results demonstrate slowing of Alzheimer’s disease progression, but to date do not fully halt or reverse this progression. Optimization of anti‐amyloid therapy (timing and duration of intervention, modality, combinations, biomarker guidance) is limited by incomplete understanding of the disease, such as relationship between amyloid and tau pathways. Mechanistic Alzheimer’s progression modeling investigated how amyloid and tau pathologies are connected in driving progression. Method Calibration data (amyloid PET, CSF Ab42, CSF p‐tau, tau PET) were obtained from a wide‐range of publications including observational trials and interventional trials with BACE inhibitors, anti‐amyloid mAbs, and anti‐tau antisense oligonucleotides. First, mechanistic representations of the key features of amyloid (monomer, oligomer, plaque) and tau (tau, p‐tau, NFTs with spatial spread in brain) pathology were developed separately. Next a broad empiric exploration of a large range of amyloid‐tau links was undertaken with an objective to identify a limited number of models that can describe all the available clinical data. Result Twenty eight variations on connecting models were considered; 12 were eliminated by review of their signature profiles, 3 due to redundancy of mechanisms, 6 due to implausible spatial mechanisms, 5 due to an inability to calibrate an amyloid component. The remaining 2 models (Amyloid plaque drives tau production or drives tau phosphorylation) could holistically describe all the available clinical data. Tau PET data from anti‐tau antisense trials were best described by a model with NFT loss (turnover 4‐times faster than amyloid plaque turnover). Further data is needed to fully characterize this process and related elements of the tau portion of the model. Simulations of early anti‐amyloid intervention (prior to emergence of tau pathology) suggested effects on progression would be enhanced relative to later intervention and emergence of tau pathology could be substantially delayed. Conclusion Modeling which combines mechanistic representation of understood aspects of disease biology and empiric explorations of less well‐understood aspects and is calibrated to human trial data only can yield important insights. Such approaches have an important role to play in optimizing therapeutic strategies as the field moves into complex questions of combinations or sequencing of multiple therapeutic interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091295
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Progression: Linking Amyloid and Tau Pathologies

Julie A. Stone, Stephen B. Duffull, Seth Robey
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
article

Mechanistic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Progression: Linking Amyloid and Tau Pathologies

Julie A. Stone, Stephen B. Duffull, Seth Robey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent anti‐amyloid mAb trial results demonstrate slowing of Alzheimer’s disease progression, but to date do not fully halt or reverse this progression. Optimization of anti‐amyloid therapy (timing and duration of intervention, modality, combinations, biomarker guidance) is limited by incomplete understanding of the disease, such as relationship between amyloid and tau pathways. Mechanistic Alzheimer’s progression modeling investigated how amyloid and tau pathologies are connected in driving progression. Method Calibration data (amyloid PET, CSF Ab42, CSF p‐tau, tau PET) were obtained from a wide‐range of publications including observational trials and interventional trials with BACE inhibitors, anti‐amyloid mAbs, and anti‐tau antisense oligonucleotides. First, mechanistic representations of the key features of amyloid (monomer, oligomer, plaque) and tau (tau, p‐tau, NFTs with spatial spread in brain) pathology were developed separately. Next a broad empiric exploration of a large range of amyloid‐tau links was undertaken with an objective to identify a limited number of models that can describe all the available clinical data. Result Twenty eight variations on connecting models were considered; 12 were eliminated by review of their signature profiles, 3 due to redundancy of mechanisms, 6 due to implausible spatial mechanisms, 5 due to an inability to calibrate an amyloid component. The remaining 2 models (Amyloid plaque drives tau production or drives tau phosphorylation) could holistically describe all the available clinical data. Tau PET data from anti‐tau antisense trials were best described by a model with NFT loss (turnover 4‐times faster than amyloid plaque turnover). Further data is needed to fully characterize this process and related elements of the tau portion of the model. Simulations of early anti‐amyloid intervention (prior to emergence of tau pathology) suggested effects on progression would be enhanced relative to later intervention and emergence of tau pathology could be substantially delayed. Conclusion Modeling which combines mechanistic representation of understood aspects of disease biology and empiric explorations of less well‐understood aspects and is calibrated to human trial data only can yield important insights. Such approaches have an important role to play in optimizing therapeutic strategies as the field moves into complex questions of combinations or sequencing of multiple therapeutic interventions.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Certara (United States) (US), Integra LifeSciences (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.