Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid tau MTBR species binding to Bepranemab

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology involves the deposition in brain of aggregates enriched with microtubule‐binding‐region (MTBR) of tau adopting an abnormal conformation between residues 306‐378 in the core of aggregates. Anti‐tau drugs targeting around this domain have the potential to interfere with the cell‐to‐cell propagation of pathological tau. Bepranemab is a humanized monoclonal Ig4 antibody binding to tau residues 235‐250. Previous studies showed this antibody binds to tau monomers; inhibits tau seeding in cellular assay and prevents tau pathology spread in a mouse model. The target engagement of bepranemab in human biofluids is unknown. This study aims to characterize cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau species binding to this antibody. Methods We used mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize CSF tau species precipitating with bepranemab cross‐linked to sepharose beads. Precipitated CSF tau species were digested with trypsin and tau peptides were quantified by signal comparison to peptides from tau labeled standard. We characterized and compared the amount of bepranemab‐reactive tau species recovered from neat CSF and from CSF initially depleted from N‐terminal and Mid‐domain truncated tau species. Then, we analyzed Bepranemab precipitates in CSF samples from 14 asymptomatic dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (DIAD) mutation carriers (aMC), 16 symptomatic (sMC) and 15 non‐carriers (NC). Results Bepranemab bound to a mixture of CSF N‐terminal and Mid‐domain tau‐truncated fragments including mainly 226‐254 tau residues on their C‐terminal domain (Figure 1). Bepranemab‐reactive species not containing the N‐ter and the Mid‐domain of tau were mostly comprised of fragments including tau residues 226 to 267. Minor bepranemab‐reactive tau species contained tau residues 275 to 290 on their C‐terminal. Tau peptides after residues 317 were not detected above the MS limit of detection. In DIAD, the pool of bepranemab‐immunoreactive CSF tau fragments significantly increased in asymptomatic and symptomatic mutations carriers respectively (Figure 2). Conclusions The pool of CSF tau species included a subset of tau MTBR‐containing fragments recovered by bepranemab. A minor fraction of these fragments had domains overlapping with the upstream domain constituting the AD tau aggregate core. These fragments increased over DIAD stages. Our study supports bepranemab engagement against a specific pool of tau species in CSF. This work was sponsored by UCB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089980
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid tau MTBR species binding to Bepranemab

Patrick Downey, Randall John Bateman, Yingxin He, Brendan Androff et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid tau MTBR species binding to Bepranemab

Patrick Downey, Randall John Bateman, Yingxin He, Brendan Androff, Eric McDade, Nicolas R. Barthélemy, Yan Li, Tiffany Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology involves the deposition in brain of aggregates enriched with microtubule‐binding‐region (MTBR) of tau adopting an abnormal conformation between residues 306‐378 in the core of aggregates. Anti‐tau drugs targeting around this domain have the potential to interfere with the cell‐to‐cell propagation of pathological tau. Bepranemab is a humanized monoclonal Ig4 antibody binding to tau residues 235‐250. Previous studies showed this antibody binds to tau monomers; inhibits tau seeding in cellular assay and prevents tau pathology spread in a mouse model. The target engagement of bepranemab in human biofluids is unknown. This study aims to characterize cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau species binding to this antibody. Methods We used mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize CSF tau species precipitating with bepranemab cross‐linked to sepharose beads. Precipitated CSF tau species were digested with trypsin and tau peptides were quantified by signal comparison to peptides from tau labeled standard. We characterized and compared the amount of bepranemab‐reactive tau species recovered from neat CSF and from CSF initially depleted from N‐terminal and Mid‐domain truncated tau species. Then, we analyzed Bepranemab precipitates in CSF samples from 14 asymptomatic dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (DIAD) mutation carriers (aMC), 16 symptomatic (sMC) and 15 non‐carriers (NC). Results Bepranemab bound to a mixture of CSF N‐terminal and Mid‐domain tau‐truncated fragments including mainly 226‐254 tau residues on their C‐terminal domain (Figure 1). Bepranemab‐reactive species not containing the N‐ter and the Mid‐domain of tau were mostly comprised of fragments including tau residues 226 to 267. Minor bepranemab‐reactive tau species contained tau residues 275 to 290 on their C‐terminal. Tau peptides after residues 317 were not detected above the MS limit of detection. In DIAD, the pool of bepranemab‐immunoreactive CSF tau fragments significantly increased in asymptomatic and symptomatic mutations carriers respectively (Figure 2). Conclusions The pool of CSF tau species included a subset of tau MTBR‐containing fragments recovered by bepranemab. A minor fraction of these fragments had domains overlapping with the upstream domain constituting the AD tau aggregate core. These fragments increased over DIAD stages. Our study supports bepranemab engagement against a specific pool of tau species in CSF. This work was sponsored by UCB.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), UCB Pharma (Belgium) (BE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.