Racial differences in blood pressure variability in the SPRINT trial

Abstract Background Blood pressure (BP) management is an accessible therapeutic target for dementia prevention. BP variability (BPV) is a newer aspect of BP control recently associated with cognitive decline, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), independent of traditionally targeted mean BP levels. Most of this work has relied on largely non‐Hispanic White study samples in observational cohorts. It remains unclear what role BPV may play in dementia‐related racial/ethnic health disparities. We examined whether BPV differed by race in the SPRINT BP clinical trial. Method In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial, 8034 participants (median (SD) 67 (9.3) years; 34.8% female; 28.6% Black; 58.9% White; 10.8% Hispanic; 1.7% Other) underwent 4 BP measurements over a 9‐month period after treatment randomization (standard [<140 mmHg systolic target] vs intensive [<120 mmHg systolic target] BP lowering). Visit‐to‐visit systolic BPV was calculated as variability independent of mean. Racial groups (Black vs White vs Hispanic vs Other) were compared on BPV using ANCOVA models adjusted for age, sex, mean BP over the same 9‐month period, and number of antihypertensive medications used. Analyses were stratified by standard vs intensive treatment group. Result Under standard BP lowering treatment, systolic BPV significantly differed by race ( F 3,3969 = 10.11, p < .001). When compared to Hispanic participants (mean (SD) 8.96 (1.1) mmHg), systolic BPV was higher in Black (9.26 (1.0) mmHg; .30 mmHg difference; p < .001), White (9.20 (1.0) mmHg; .24 mmHg difference; p < .001), and Other (9.31 (.9) mmHg; .35 mmHg difference; p = .01) participants. Racial groups did not significantly differ on systolic BPV under intensive BP treatment ( F 3,3978 = 1.41, p = .24). Conclusion Although the SPRINT trial found no racial differences in treatment effects on cardiovascular benefits/risks, our findings suggest BPV differs by race, particularly under standard BP treatment. BPV is an emerging risk factor for dementia that may require unique treatment approaches beyond traditional lowering strategies. Findings could have therapeutic implications for patient‐centered care strategies aimed at reducing dementia risk and enhance our broader understanding of health disparities in vascular health relevant to AD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086458
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial differences in blood pressure variability in the SPRINT trial

Daniel A. Nation, Isabel J. Sible
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Racial differences in blood pressure variability in the SPRINT trial

Daniel A. Nation, Isabel J. Sible
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Blood pressure (BP) management is an accessible therapeutic target for dementia prevention. BP variability (BPV) is a newer aspect of BP control recently associated with cognitive decline, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), independent of traditionally targeted mean BP levels. Most of this work has relied on largely non‐Hispanic White study samples in observational cohorts. It remains unclear what role BPV may play in dementia‐related racial/ethnic health disparities. We examined whether BPV differed by race in the SPRINT BP clinical trial. Method In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial, 8034 participants (median (SD) 67 (9.3) years; 34.8% female; 28.6% Black; 58.9% White; 10.8% Hispanic; 1.7% Other) underwent 4 BP measurements over a 9‐month period after treatment randomization (standard [<140 mmHg systolic target] vs intensive [<120 mmHg systolic target] BP lowering). Visit‐to‐visit systolic BPV was calculated as variability independent of mean. Racial groups (Black vs White vs Hispanic vs Other) were compared on BPV using ANCOVA models adjusted for age, sex, mean BP over the same 9‐month period, and number of antihypertensive medications used. Analyses were stratified by standard vs intensive treatment group. Result Under standard BP lowering treatment, systolic BPV significantly differed by race ( F 3,3969 = 10.11, p < .001). When compared to Hispanic participants (mean (SD) 8.96 (1.1) mmHg), systolic BPV was higher in Black (9.26 (1.0) mmHg; .30 mmHg difference; p < .001), White (9.20 (1.0) mmHg; .24 mmHg difference; p < .001), and Other (9.31 (.9) mmHg; .35 mmHg difference; p = .01) participants. Racial groups did not significantly differ on systolic BPV under intensive BP treatment ( F 3,3978 = 1.41, p = .24). Conclusion Although the SPRINT trial found no racial differences in treatment effects on cardiovascular benefits/risks, our findings suggest BPV differs by race, particularly under standard BP treatment. BPV is an emerging risk factor for dementia that may require unique treatment approaches beyond traditional lowering strategies. Findings could have therapeutic implications for patient‐centered care strategies aimed at reducing dementia risk and enhance our broader understanding of health disparities in vascular health relevant to AD risk.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
University of Southern California (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.