Reasons for screening failure in the evoke and evoke+ trials of semaglutide for early AD

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials report a high screening failure rate (potentially eligible trial candidates who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria during screening) due to multiple factors including stringent eligibility criteria. Here, we report the main reasons for screening failure in the 12‐week screening phase of the ongoing evoke (NCT04777396) and evoke+ (NCT04777409) trials of semaglutide in early AD. Method Key inclusion criteria were age 55‐85 years; mild cognitive impairment due to AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5 plus CDR of ≥0.5 in ≥1 of three activities of daily living categories) or mild AD dementia (CDR global score of 1.0); Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status delayed memory index (RBANS‐DMI) score ≤85; Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥22; amyloid positivity (confirmed by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid). Additionally, evoke+ allowed the inclusion of participants with significant small vessel pathology (>1 lacunar infarct and/or age‐related white matter changes >2 [white matter >20 mm]). Among the exclusion criteria were evidence of neurological disorders other than AD; evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computerized tomography (CT) scan suggestive of clinically significant structural central nervous system (CNS) disease (other than the changes allowed for evoke+) nor suggestive of strategic infarcts. Screening failure rates were summarized descriptively. Data cleaning of the 3806 randomized individuals is ongoing in evoke/evoke+. Result The total number of screening failures was 2,836 (58.6%) in evoke and 3,087 (59.8%) in evoke+. The top five categories of screening failure in evoke and evoke+ were RBANS‐DMI score ≤85, MMSE score ≥22, amyloid positivity, CDR score, and MRI/CT scan suggestive of CNS disease (other than the changes allowed for evoke+) or strategic infarcts (Figure). This reflected the hierarchical procedure applied during screening, whereby individuals were firstly assessed on cognitive scores, followed by exclusion of other neurological disorders and, lastly, confirmation of amyloid positivity. Conclusion The hierarchical screening procedure in evoke and evoke+ resulted in most ineligible patients being excluded early in the screening process. The main reasons for screen failure were cognitive assessment scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reasons for screening failure in the evoke and evoke+ trials of semaglutide for early AD

Mary Sano, Lars Bardtrum, Peter Johannsen, Philip Scheltens et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
0.39
article

Reasons for screening failure in the evoke and evoke+ trials of semaglutide for early AD

Mary Sano, Lars Bardtrum, Peter Johannsen, Philip Scheltens, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Charlotte T. Hansen, Howard Feldman, Oskar Hansson, Rose Jeppesen, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Teresa León
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials report a high screening failure rate (potentially eligible trial candidates who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria during screening) due to multiple factors including stringent eligibility criteria. Here, we report the main reasons for screening failure in the 12‐week screening phase of the ongoing evoke (NCT04777396) and evoke+ (NCT04777409) trials of semaglutide in early AD. Method Key inclusion criteria were age 55‐85 years; mild cognitive impairment due to AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5 plus CDR of ≥0.5 in ≥1 of three activities of daily living categories) or mild AD dementia (CDR global score of 1.0); Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status delayed memory index (RBANS‐DMI) score ≤85; Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥22; amyloid positivity (confirmed by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid). Additionally, evoke+ allowed the inclusion of participants with significant small vessel pathology (>1 lacunar infarct and/or age‐related white matter changes >2 [white matter >20 mm]). Among the exclusion criteria were evidence of neurological disorders other than AD; evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computerized tomography (CT) scan suggestive of clinically significant structural central nervous system (CNS) disease (other than the changes allowed for evoke+) nor suggestive of strategic infarcts. Screening failure rates were summarized descriptively. Data cleaning of the 3806 randomized individuals is ongoing in evoke/evoke+. Result The total number of screening failures was 2,836 (58.6%) in evoke and 3,087 (59.8%) in evoke+. The top five categories of screening failure in evoke and evoke+ were RBANS‐DMI score ≤85, MMSE score ≥22, amyloid positivity, CDR score, and MRI/CT scan suggestive of CNS disease (other than the changes allowed for evoke+) or strategic infarcts (Figure). This reflected the hierarchical procedure applied during screening, whereby individuals were firstly assessed on cognitive scores, followed by exclusion of other neurological disorders and, lastly, confirmation of amyloid positivity. Conclusion The hierarchical screening procedure in evoke and evoke+ resulted in most ineligible patients being excluded early in the screening process. The main reasons for screen failure were cognitive assessment scores.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S6)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Lund University (SE), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), University of California San Diego (US), James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US), M&I/Partners (NL), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.