Ancestry‐specific effects of <i>APOE</i> on AD endophenotypes and modifiable risk factors

Abstract Background APOE is highly pleiotropic, with the e4 allele the strongest genetic risk factor for late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and associated with other cardiometabolic traits. The APOE *e4 allele demonstrates ancestry‐specific differences in the risk for AD. Here, we investigated whether similar ancestry‐specific effects are observed across other AD endophenotypes and modifiable risk factors for AD. Method Participants were 2505 non‐Hispanic Whites, Hispanics, and African Americans with genetic data from the Health and Aging Brain Study ‐ Health Disparities cohort (Table 1). Genetic ancestry was determined through principal component analysis, by projecting participants onto the 1000 Genomes reference panel. Global ancestry proportions were estimated using ADMIXTURE. The association of APOE *e4+ and *e2+ alleles with cognitive performance, plasma biomarkers, neuroimaging, and clinical comorbidities was investigated using regression models stratified by European (EUR), Amerindian (AMR), and African (AFR) ancestry. Covariates included age, gender, education; and intracranial volume for neuroimaging endophenotypes. Ancestry‐specific effects were determined by evaluating the equality in regression coefficients from the ancestry‐stratified models. Result Genetic ancestry assignments were highly concordant with self‐reported race: 1071 EUR, 1003 AMR, and 431 AFR participants (Table 1). APOE *e4 was associated with lower BMI, poorer cognitive performance, increased risk of cognitive impairment and dyslipidemia, reduced cortical thickness and hippocampal volume, and plasma biomarkers levels ‐ higher pTau 181 , lower Ab 42 , and Ab 42 /Ab 40 ratios (Figure 1). APOE *e2 was associated with reduced dyslipidemia risk (Figure 2). Notably, ancestry‐specific effects were observed, with APOE *e4 associated with lower Ab 42 /Ab 40 in EUR compared to AMR. Additionally, APOE *e2 shows ancestry‐specific effects for Ab 42 /Ab 40 , pTau 181, and Ab 40 . In particular, AFR have a lower Ab 42 /Ab 40 compared to both EUR and AMR. EUR have lower levels of pTau 181 compared to both AFR and AMR. AFR have higher Ab 40 compared to EUR and AMR. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that the impact of APOE on AD endophenotypes varies across ancestries, notably with amyloid and tau plasma biomarkers, and dyslipidemia. This underscores the critical need to consider genetic ancestry in assessing the effect of APOE on AD endophenotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095645
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ancestry‐specific effects of APOE on AD endophenotypes and modifiable risk factors

Robert Barber, Shea J. Andrews, Kristine S. Yaffe, Sid E. O’Bryant et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
article

Ancestry‐specific effects of APOE on AD endophenotypes and modifiable risk factors

Robert Barber, Shea J. Andrews, Kristine S. Yaffe, Sid E. O’Bryant, Nicole Phillips, Brian Fulton‐Howard, Ana I Boeriu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background APOE is highly pleiotropic, with the e4 allele the strongest genetic risk factor for late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and associated with other cardiometabolic traits. The APOE *e4 allele demonstrates ancestry‐specific differences in the risk for AD. Here, we investigated whether similar ancestry‐specific effects are observed across other AD endophenotypes and modifiable risk factors for AD. Method Participants were 2505 non‐Hispanic Whites, Hispanics, and African Americans with genetic data from the Health and Aging Brain Study ‐ Health Disparities cohort (Table 1). Genetic ancestry was determined through principal component analysis, by projecting participants onto the 1000 Genomes reference panel. Global ancestry proportions were estimated using ADMIXTURE. The association of APOE *e4+ and *e2+ alleles with cognitive performance, plasma biomarkers, neuroimaging, and clinical comorbidities was investigated using regression models stratified by European (EUR), Amerindian (AMR), and African (AFR) ancestry. Covariates included age, gender, education; and intracranial volume for neuroimaging endophenotypes. Ancestry‐specific effects were determined by evaluating the equality in regression coefficients from the ancestry‐stratified models. Result Genetic ancestry assignments were highly concordant with self‐reported race: 1071 EUR, 1003 AMR, and 431 AFR participants (Table 1). APOE *e4 was associated with lower BMI, poorer cognitive performance, increased risk of cognitive impairment and dyslipidemia, reduced cortical thickness and hippocampal volume, and plasma biomarkers levels ‐ higher pTau 181 , lower Ab 42 , and Ab 42 /Ab 40 ratios (Figure 1). APOE *e2 was associated with reduced dyslipidemia risk (Figure 2). Notably, ancestry‐specific effects were observed, with APOE *e4 associated with lower Ab 42 /Ab 40 in EUR compared to AMR. Additionally, APOE *e2 shows ancestry‐specific effects for Ab 42 /Ab 40 , pTau 181, and Ab 40 . In particular, AFR have a lower Ab 42 /Ab 40 compared to both EUR and AMR. EUR have lower levels of pTau 181 compared to both AFR and AMR. AFR have higher Ab 40 compared to EUR and AMR. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that the impact of APOE on AD endophenotypes varies across ancestries, notably with amyloid and tau plasma biomarkers, and dyslipidemia. This underscores the critical need to consider genetic ancestry in assessing the effect of APOE on AD endophenotypes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), San Francisco VA Health Care System (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.