Portable, Low‐field MRI for Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract Background Low‐field magnetic resonance imaging (LF‐MRI) may facilitate point‐of‐care assessment of patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) that can increase accessibility. However, image quality may be limited by lower signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). We developed a machine learning pipeline to quantify brain morphometry and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) using LF‐MRI, validated the volumes against conventional high‐field (HF) counterparts, and compared the volumes with aged controls. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD ( n = 45, age 73±8 years) were prospectively enrolled in the MGH Memory Division outpatient clinic. A separate cohort of controls ( n = 23, age 64±8 years) were enrolled from the Yale Emergency Department and used for comparison. All patients underwent LF‐MRI acquisition on a 0.064T MRI which included T2 FLAIR and T1w sequences. We processed images through FreeSurfer‐based pipelines using LF SynthSR and SynthSeg for quantification of brain volumes and WMH‐SynthSeg to measure WMH burden. HF‐MRI (1.5‐3T) scans obtained within 8±12 months of LF‐MRI acquisition were used for comparison. Whole brain, hippocampal, and lateral ventricle volumes and WMH were quantified from HF and LF scans in patients and controls, normalized to intracranial volume (mean±SD). Results Brain volumes quantified on LF‐ and HF‐MRI were correlated, including hippocampal (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72‐0.93), whole brain (r = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96‐1.0) and lateral ventricle (r = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96‐1.0) volumes (all p<0.0001). WMH burden was also correlated (r = 0.80, 95% CI 0.66‐0.91) between LF‐ and HF‐MRI scans. Compared to controls, hippocampal volumes were smaller among those with MCI or AD (2.3±0.2 −3 versus 2.6±0.3 −3 , p = 0.0001). A similar reduction in whole brain volume was observed in MCI/AD patients (591.2±19.8 −3 versus 621.3±20.5 −3 , p = 0.0001), which was accompanied by ventricular enlargement (18.6±7.4 −3 cf . 13.1 ±7.3 −3 , p = 0.0007). Conclusion Point‐of‐care LF‐MRI of patients with MCI or dementia due to AD is feasible and generates accurate brain volumes and WMH burden when combined with machine learning algorithms. Collectively, our findings demonstrate LF‐MRI’s potential in cost‐effective image evaluation for cognitive impairment that may reduce disparities in access. Our findings also highlight the future potential for routine longitudinal assessment, disease staging, and monitoring during anti‐amyloid treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095305
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portable, Low‐field MRI for Alzheimer’s Disease

W. Taylor Kimberly
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Portable, Low‐field MRI for Alzheimer’s Disease

W. Taylor Kimberly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Low‐field magnetic resonance imaging (LF‐MRI) may facilitate point‐of‐care assessment of patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) that can increase accessibility. However, image quality may be limited by lower signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). We developed a machine learning pipeline to quantify brain morphometry and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) using LF‐MRI, validated the volumes against conventional high‐field (HF) counterparts, and compared the volumes with aged controls. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD ( n = 45, age 73±8 years) were prospectively enrolled in the MGH Memory Division outpatient clinic. A separate cohort of controls ( n = 23, age 64±8 years) were enrolled from the Yale Emergency Department and used for comparison. All patients underwent LF‐MRI acquisition on a 0.064T MRI which included T2 FLAIR and T1w sequences. We processed images through FreeSurfer‐based pipelines using LF SynthSR and SynthSeg for quantification of brain volumes and WMH‐SynthSeg to measure WMH burden. HF‐MRI (1.5‐3T) scans obtained within 8±12 months of LF‐MRI acquisition were used for comparison. Whole brain, hippocampal, and lateral ventricle volumes and WMH were quantified from HF and LF scans in patients and controls, normalized to intracranial volume (mean±SD). Results Brain volumes quantified on LF‐ and HF‐MRI were correlated, including hippocampal (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72‐0.93), whole brain (r = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96‐1.0) and lateral ventricle (r = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96‐1.0) volumes (all p<0.0001). WMH burden was also correlated (r = 0.80, 95% CI 0.66‐0.91) between LF‐ and HF‐MRI scans. Compared to controls, hippocampal volumes were smaller among those with MCI or AD (2.3±0.2 −3 versus 2.6±0.3 −3 , p = 0.0001). A similar reduction in whole brain volume was observed in MCI/AD patients (591.2±19.8 −3 versus 621.3±20.5 −3 , p = 0.0001), which was accompanied by ventricular enlargement (18.6±7.4 −3 cf . 13.1 ±7.3 −3 , p = 0.0007). Conclusion Point‐of‐care LF‐MRI of patients with MCI or dementia due to AD is feasible and generates accurate brain volumes and WMH burden when combined with machine learning algorithms. Collectively, our findings demonstrate LF‐MRI’s potential in cost‐effective image evaluation for cognitive impairment that may reduce disparities in access. Our findings also highlight the future potential for routine longitudinal assessment, disease staging, and monitoring during anti‐amyloid treatment.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.