Blood Gene Expression Network Expression Strongly Relates to Brain Amyloid Burden

Abstract Background Amyloid deposition occurs during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) a decade or more before clinical symptoms emerge. We leveraged blood transcriptomics and positron emission tomography (PET) measures of amyloidosis to identify cell types and gene networks in the blood that relate to amyloid burden in the brain. Method Whole blood RNA sequencing and amyloid PET data were leveraged from 1771 participants (62% females, mean age 71, 32% amyloid+) in the Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease (A4) Study. RNAseq data were aligned with STAR, sorted, counted using Subread, and batch normalized with voom. 19,945 genes were available for analysis following quality control. Cell fractions were quantified using CIBERSORTx (LM22 used as reference) and WGCNA was used to calculate gene co‐expression modules (soft threshold = 12). Amyloid PET data were acquired using 18F‐florbetapir 50‐70 minutes post injection and a global cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was quantified (whole cerebellum as reference). Linear regression related gene module expression or cell fraction to mean SUVR, covarying for age, sex, education, APOE ε2 and ε4 status. Correction for multiple comparisons used false discovery rate. Gene enrichment was performed using Gene Ontology. Result Two gene modules were associated with amyloid deposition. One included 48 genes whereby higher expression was associated with lower amyloid burden (β = ‐12.37, p = 0.0001). This module was enriched for DNA damage pathway genes and the top gene associations in the module included histone genes such as H3C3 and H2AC14 . The second module included 241 genes whereby higher expression related to higher amyloid burden (β = 7.15, p = 0.001). This module was enriched for leukocyte migration and regulation of RNA pathways. The top gene association in the module was the calcium homeostasis gene CHERP . Finally, a higher proportion of CD4 positive activated memory T cells was associated with higher amyloid burden (β = ‐1.940, p = 0.04), but did not survive FDR correction. Conclusion Our results implicate DNA damage and activated memory T cells as contributing to amyloid deposition in preclinical AD. Future work will seek to identify modifiers of the APOE effect on amyloid and evaluate blood transcription networks as complementary biomarkers of amyloid deposition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095089
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Gene Expression Network Expression Strongly Relates to Brain Amyloid Burden

Timothy J. Hohman, Robert A. Rissman, Logan C. Dumitrescu, Rachel F. Buckley et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Blood Gene Expression Network Expression Strongly Relates to Brain Amyloid Burden

Timothy J. Hohman, Robert A. Rissman, Logan C. Dumitrescu, Rachel F. Buckley, Paul S. S Aisen, Mary Ellen I. Koran, Vaibhav A. Janve, Mabel Seto, Reisa A Sperling
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Amyloid deposition occurs during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) a decade or more before clinical symptoms emerge. We leveraged blood transcriptomics and positron emission tomography (PET) measures of amyloidosis to identify cell types and gene networks in the blood that relate to amyloid burden in the brain. Method Whole blood RNA sequencing and amyloid PET data were leveraged from 1771 participants (62% females, mean age 71, 32% amyloid+) in the Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease (A4) Study. RNAseq data were aligned with STAR, sorted, counted using Subread, and batch normalized with voom. 19,945 genes were available for analysis following quality control. Cell fractions were quantified using CIBERSORTx (LM22 used as reference) and WGCNA was used to calculate gene co‐expression modules (soft threshold = 12). Amyloid PET data were acquired using 18F‐florbetapir 50‐70 minutes post injection and a global cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was quantified (whole cerebellum as reference). Linear regression related gene module expression or cell fraction to mean SUVR, covarying for age, sex, education, APOE ε2 and ε4 status. Correction for multiple comparisons used false discovery rate. Gene enrichment was performed using Gene Ontology. Result Two gene modules were associated with amyloid deposition. One included 48 genes whereby higher expression was associated with lower amyloid burden (β = ‐12.37, p = 0.0001). This module was enriched for DNA damage pathway genes and the top gene associations in the module included histone genes such as H3C3 and H2AC14 . The second module included 241 genes whereby higher expression related to higher amyloid burden (β = 7.15, p = 0.001). This module was enriched for leukocyte migration and regulation of RNA pathways. The top gene association in the module was the calcium homeostasis gene CHERP . Finally, a higher proportion of CD4 positive activated memory T cells was associated with higher amyloid burden (β = ‐1.940, p = 0.04), but did not survive FDR correction. Conclusion Our results implicate DNA damage and activated memory T cells as contributing to amyloid deposition in preclinical AD. Future work will seek to identify modifiers of the APOE effect on amyloid and evaluate blood transcription networks as complementary biomarkers of amyloid deposition.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of Southern California (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Autism Research Institute (US), Harvard University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Clinical Research Consortium (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.