Joseph Rex Young: George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form, New York: Routledge, 2019

Joseph Rex Young’s book titled George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form fills a tremendous gap that has been present in contemporary fantasy studies: while several books have been written about the study of Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire that focus on the different readings of the fantasy series, and the success of the mega-franchise that grew out of the narrative, Young’s monograph attempts to find Martin’s place in the modern fantasy genre. One of the most refreshing aspects of the book is that instead of treating Tolkien and his work as the exemplar of fantasy, Young highlights how while it is to some extent understandable (since Tolkien’s popularity in the genre is beyond dispute), “Tolkien was a hugely idiosyncratic writer whose inspirations, motives and methodologies bear little resemblance to those of the authors of genre fantasy, much of which consists of narrative iterations of pre-existing intellectual properties” (4–5). While several comparisons have been made in fan circles between The Lord of the Rings and A Song of Ice and Fire, and how Martin has changed the rules of the fantasy genre, Young argues that instead of abandoning the rules of the fantasy formulae, Martin followed them very strictly. Thus, George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form is about the analysis of how Martin’s epic saga relates to the genre of fantasy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pázmány papers.
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69706/pp.2024.2.1.10
Primary Topic
Themes in Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joseph Rex Young: George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form, New York: Routledge, 2019

Nikolett Sipos
Pázmány papers.
Themes in Literature Analysis
article

Joseph Rex Young: George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form, New York: Routledge, 2019

Nikolett Sipos
article en

Abstract

Joseph Rex Young’s book titled George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form fills a tremendous gap that has been present in contemporary fantasy studies: while several books have been written about the study of Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire that focus on the different readings of the fantasy series, and the success of the mega-franchise that grew out of the narrative, Young’s monograph attempts to find Martin’s place in the modern fantasy genre. One of the most refreshing aspects of the book is that instead of treating Tolkien and his work as the exemplar of fantasy, Young highlights how while it is to some extent understandable (since Tolkien’s popularity in the genre is beyond dispute), “Tolkien was a hugely idiosyncratic writer whose inspirations, motives and methodologies bear little resemblance to those of the authors of genre fantasy, much of which consists of narrative iterations of pre-existing intellectual properties” (4–5). While several comparisons have been made in fan circles between The Lord of the Rings and A Song of Ice and Fire, and how Martin has changed the rules of the fantasy genre, Young argues that instead of abandoning the rules of the fantasy formulae, Martin followed them very strictly. Thus, George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form is about the analysis of how Martin’s epic saga relates to the genre of fantasy.

Pázmány papers.Vol. 2(1)
Public Health Dayton & Montgomery County (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Themes in Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Joseph Rex Young: George R.R. Martin and the Fantasy Form, New York: Routledge, 2019 — Nikolett Sipos · Pázmány papers. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS