Neurobiological and clinical characteristics of amnestic patients with Lewy body pathology

Abstract Background While Lewy body (LB) pathology typically associates with a distinct clinical profile compared to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), early memory deficits are not uncommon and can confound clinical diagnosis of amnestic patients. Moreover, approximately 30‐60% of AD patients have concomitant LB pathology, which has been reported to affect the clinical phenotype and result in a more aggressive disease course. Recently developed a‐synuclein seed amplification assays (aSyn‐SAAs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for LB diseases, but the role of these novel biomarkers in the context of amnestic presentations typical for AD remains to be investigated in more detail. Method We studied 872 patients from the ADNI cohort with a baseline diagnosis of aMCI (N=661) or AD dementia (N=211), who had CSF and FDG‐PET data available. CSF samples were analyzed for peptide levels of Aß1‐42 and p‐tau181, and aSyn positivity was evaluated using a novel aSyn‐SAA. Based on positive/negative results on the different biomarkers, subjects were grouped into “AD‐/LB‐” (A‐T‐aSyn‐, N=106), “AD+/LB‐” (A+T+aSyn‐, N=336), “AD+/LB+” (A+T+aSyn+, N=158) and “AD‐/LB+” ((A‐|T‐)aSyn+, N=68). We analyzed group differences in demographics, APOE4 positivity, neurodegeneration patterns (FDG‐PET), as well as baseline and longitudinal scores of global cognition (MMSE) and domain‐specific function (ADNI_MEM, ADNI_EXEC). Result At baseline, AD+/LB+ showed worse global cognition (MMSE: d=‐0.27, p=0.004) and memory performance than AD+/LB‐ (ADNI_MEM: d=‐0.26, p<0.006). AD‐/LB+ were less globally impaired (p<0.001) and characterized by a markedly more dysexecutive profile (d(MEM‐EXEC): p<0.002). AD+/LB+ progressed faster on all cognitive scores, but they did not develop a differential cognitive profile compared to AD+/LB‐ (Figure 1). APOE4 positivity was similar between AD+/LB+ and AD+/LB‐ (72% vs. 75%, p=0.28) but lower in AD‐/LB+ (28%, p<0.001). In FDG‐PET, AD+/LB+ was characterized by a temporo‐parietal hypometabolism pattern similar to that of AD+/LB‐ but with higher effect sizes (Fig‐2). By contrast, AD‐/LB+ showed a strikingly different posterior‐occipital pattern of hypometabolism. Conclusion LB co‐pathology in AD was associated with more severe neurodegeneration and faster cognitive decline, but an amnestic AD‐typical phenotype. By contrast, patients with relatively pure LB pathology were characterized by a more dysexecutive cognitive profile and a distinct hypometabolism pattern typically suggestive of LB disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093793
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurobiological and clinical characteristics of amnestic patients with Lewy body pathology

Michel J. Grothe, Miguel A. Labrador‐Espinosa, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Alexis Moscoso et al.
1 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

Neurobiological and clinical characteristics of amnestic patients with Lewy body pathology

Michel J. Grothe, Miguel A. Labrador‐Espinosa, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Alexis Moscoso, Michael Schöll, Jesús Silva‐Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background While Lewy body (LB) pathology typically associates with a distinct clinical profile compared to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), early memory deficits are not uncommon and can confound clinical diagnosis of amnestic patients. Moreover, approximately 30‐60% of AD patients have concomitant LB pathology, which has been reported to affect the clinical phenotype and result in a more aggressive disease course. Recently developed a‐synuclein seed amplification assays (aSyn‐SAAs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for LB diseases, but the role of these novel biomarkers in the context of amnestic presentations typical for AD remains to be investigated in more detail. Method We studied 872 patients from the ADNI cohort with a baseline diagnosis of aMCI (N=661) or AD dementia (N=211), who had CSF and FDG‐PET data available. CSF samples were analyzed for peptide levels of Aß1‐42 and p‐tau181, and aSyn positivity was evaluated using a novel aSyn‐SAA. Based on positive/negative results on the different biomarkers, subjects were grouped into “AD‐/LB‐” (A‐T‐aSyn‐, N=106), “AD+/LB‐” (A+T+aSyn‐, N=336), “AD+/LB+” (A+T+aSyn+, N=158) and “AD‐/LB+” ((A‐|T‐)aSyn+, N=68). We analyzed group differences in demographics, APOE4 positivity, neurodegeneration patterns (FDG‐PET), as well as baseline and longitudinal scores of global cognition (MMSE) and domain‐specific function (ADNI_MEM, ADNI_EXEC). Result At baseline, AD+/LB+ showed worse global cognition (MMSE: d=‐0.27, p=0.004) and memory performance than AD+/LB‐ (ADNI_MEM: d=‐0.26, p<0.006). AD‐/LB+ were less globally impaired (p<0.001) and characterized by a markedly more dysexecutive profile (d(MEM‐EXEC): p<0.002). AD+/LB+ progressed faster on all cognitive scores, but they did not develop a differential cognitive profile compared to AD+/LB‐ (Figure 1). APOE4 positivity was similar between AD+/LB+ and AD+/LB‐ (72% vs. 75%, p=0.28) but lower in AD‐/LB+ (28%, p<0.001). In FDG‐PET, AD+/LB+ was characterized by a temporo‐parietal hypometabolism pattern similar to that of AD+/LB‐ but with higher effect sizes (Fig‐2). By contrast, AD‐/LB+ showed a strikingly different posterior‐occipital pattern of hypometabolism. Conclusion LB co‐pathology in AD was associated with more severe neurodegeneration and faster cognitive decline, but an amnestic AD‐typical phenotype. By contrast, patients with relatively pure LB pathology were characterized by a more dysexecutive cognitive profile and a distinct hypometabolism pattern typically suggestive of LB disease.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Fundacion Centro De Investigacion De Enfermedades Neurologicas (ES), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.