Genetic predisposition to clinical AD and AD pathology is differentially associated with baseline and 3‐year period change for specific AD‐related markers

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early changes in brain structure and cognitive function before the age of onset. This study investigated whether the genetic load for clinical AD and AD pathology predicts AD‐related brain and cognitive changes over a 3‐year period, targeting the preclinical phase in cognitively unimpaired (CU) middle‐aged individuals. Method The sample of the study was defined by 429 CU middle‐aged participants at risk of AD from the ALFA+ nested cohort with available information on genetics, brain imaging markers and cognitive data [Table 1]. A subset of them had information at two‐time points (N = 367) [Figure 1]. Genetic predisposition for clinical AD (PRSAD and PRSADnoAPOE) and AD pathology (PRSAβ42‐CSF and PRSpTau‐CSF) were calculated. We used linear regression models to assess the association between each PRS and global amyloid PET deposition expressed in Centiloids, AD Dickerson MRI‐signature, hippocampal volume and cognitive outcomes, at baseline and rate of change over visits after controlling for confounders. PET and MRI outcomes were defined as the annual rate of change. Cognitive outcomes were z‐scores of the two‐time points difference. Models were adjusted for time between visits. Result At baseline, higher genetic predisposition to clinical AD was associated with increased amyloid‐PET levels and higher average thickness of AD‐affected regions. Additionally, higher PRSAD was associated with reduced AD‐related cognitive performance and worse language [Figure 2]. Over the three‐year period, AD‐genetic load predicted higher annual amyloid accumulation in the brain, independently of APOE. Conversely, genetic predisposition to higher CSF Aβ42 levels predicted lower annual rate of change for Centiloids. PRSAD was also associated with annual reduction of hippocampal volume. Finally, genetic predisposition to AD beyond the APOE region was associated with executive functioning rate of change[Figure 2]. Conclusion The results of this study showed the role of genetic predisposition to AD, affecting amyloid PET deposition, brain structure changes, and cognitive decline. These findings emphasized the importance of considering a comprehensive range of genetic markers in risk assessments for AD, particularly in its early stages, and highlight the potential of personalized genetic approaches to enhance predictions and interventions in the management of AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093688
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic predisposition to clinical AD and AD pathology is differentially associated with baseline and 3‐year period change for specific AD‐related markers

Blanca Rodríguez‐Fernández, Manel Esteller, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides, Mahnaz Shekari et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Genetic predisposition to clinical AD and AD pathology is differentially associated with baseline and 3‐year period change for specific AD‐related markers

Blanca Rodríguez‐Fernández, Manel Esteller, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides, Mahnaz Shekari, Arcadi Navarro, Juan Domingo Gispert, Patricia Genius, Natàlia Vilor‐Tejedor, Carolina Minguillón, David López‐Martos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early changes in brain structure and cognitive function before the age of onset. This study investigated whether the genetic load for clinical AD and AD pathology predicts AD‐related brain and cognitive changes over a 3‐year period, targeting the preclinical phase in cognitively unimpaired (CU) middle‐aged individuals. Method The sample of the study was defined by 429 CU middle‐aged participants at risk of AD from the ALFA+ nested cohort with available information on genetics, brain imaging markers and cognitive data [Table 1]. A subset of them had information at two‐time points (N = 367) [Figure 1]. Genetic predisposition for clinical AD (PRSAD and PRSADnoAPOE) and AD pathology (PRSAβ42‐CSF and PRSpTau‐CSF) were calculated. We used linear regression models to assess the association between each PRS and global amyloid PET deposition expressed in Centiloids, AD Dickerson MRI‐signature, hippocampal volume and cognitive outcomes, at baseline and rate of change over visits after controlling for confounders. PET and MRI outcomes were defined as the annual rate of change. Cognitive outcomes were z‐scores of the two‐time points difference. Models were adjusted for time between visits. Result At baseline, higher genetic predisposition to clinical AD was associated with increased amyloid‐PET levels and higher average thickness of AD‐affected regions. Additionally, higher PRSAD was associated with reduced AD‐related cognitive performance and worse language [Figure 2]. Over the three‐year period, AD‐genetic load predicted higher annual amyloid accumulation in the brain, independently of APOE. Conversely, genetic predisposition to higher CSF Aβ42 levels predicted lower annual rate of change for Centiloids. PRSAD was also associated with annual reduction of hippocampal volume. Finally, genetic predisposition to AD beyond the APOE region was associated with executive functioning rate of change[Figure 2]. Conclusion The results of this study showed the role of genetic predisposition to AD, affecting amyloid PET deposition, brain structure changes, and cognitive decline. These findings emphasized the importance of considering a comprehensive range of genetic markers in risk assessments for AD, particularly in its early stages, and highlight the potential of personalized genetic approaches to enhance predictions and interventions in the management of AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Municipal Institute for Medical Research (ES), Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.