Gray matter microstructural changes due to cognitive aging in healthy cohort

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment with age remains undetected until it interferes daily life activity or presents dementia symptoms. In the US, 61% of dementia population is not diagnosed, which is in part due to limited sensitivity of clinical neuroimaging modalities in assessing early gray matter (GM) changes. Here we look at microstructural changes in GM using mean apparent propagator (MAP‐MRI) in cognitively underperforming (CU) and healthy aging (HA) cohorts, grouped according to their cognitive performance based on the NIH Toolbox. Methods 725 subjects aged 36 to 90 years were included in this study using the Human Connectome Project‐Aging (HCP‐A) imaging dataset (T1w, multi‐shell diffusion ‐dMRI). Nine NIH Toolbox measures were used to classify CU and HA population groups ( Figure 1 ). Each test score was z‐normalized and subjects in the lower and upper 50 th percentile in all 9 tests were considered as CU and HA, respectively. Diffusion data was processed using TORTOISE dMRI processing package. Corrected DWIs were processed using MAP‐MRI, which yielded the following parameters: return to origin/axis/plane probability (RTOP, RTAP, RTPP), non‐Gaussianity (NG), and propagator anisotropy (PA) ( Figure 2a ). The T1w images were processed generating 125 SLANT cortical and subcortical regions of interest ( Figure 2b ). Two‐way ANOVA was used to investigate group differences while accounting for age, sex, education and site. All statistical analysis was done in Matlab2022b. Results The list of tests and respective scores of the two groups is provided in Figure 1. Zero‐displacement probabilities were more sensitive in detecting group differences compared to NG and PA. The two groups displayed notable differences in the following brain regions: the operculum, involved in visuospatial cognition; the precuneus, key to memory retrieval; and the posterior cingulate, which plays a role in processing speed, executive function, and memory. Additionally, the auditory and sensory‐related areas exhibited significant variations, aligning with expectations. These group differences are shown in Figure 3. Conclusion This study underscores the common occurrence of cognitive aging among the healthy population and demonstrates that MAP‐MRI is a valuable tool for assessing GM microstructural changes, particularly when comparing these changes to those observed in resilient aging populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095565
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gray matter microstructural changes due to cognitive aging in healthy cohort

Kavita Singh, Luigi Ferrucci, Kurt G. Schilling, Dan Benjamini et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Gray matter microstructural changes due to cognitive aging in healthy cohort

Kavita Singh, Luigi Ferrucci, Kurt G. Schilling, Dan Benjamini, Stephanie Barsoum, Yang An
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment with age remains undetected until it interferes daily life activity or presents dementia symptoms. In the US, 61% of dementia population is not diagnosed, which is in part due to limited sensitivity of clinical neuroimaging modalities in assessing early gray matter (GM) changes. Here we look at microstructural changes in GM using mean apparent propagator (MAP‐MRI) in cognitively underperforming (CU) and healthy aging (HA) cohorts, grouped according to their cognitive performance based on the NIH Toolbox. Methods 725 subjects aged 36 to 90 years were included in this study using the Human Connectome Project‐Aging (HCP‐A) imaging dataset (T1w, multi‐shell diffusion ‐dMRI). Nine NIH Toolbox measures were used to classify CU and HA population groups ( Figure 1 ). Each test score was z‐normalized and subjects in the lower and upper 50 th percentile in all 9 tests were considered as CU and HA, respectively. Diffusion data was processed using TORTOISE dMRI processing package. Corrected DWIs were processed using MAP‐MRI, which yielded the following parameters: return to origin/axis/plane probability (RTOP, RTAP, RTPP), non‐Gaussianity (NG), and propagator anisotropy (PA) ( Figure 2a ). The T1w images were processed generating 125 SLANT cortical and subcortical regions of interest ( Figure 2b ). Two‐way ANOVA was used to investigate group differences while accounting for age, sex, education and site. All statistical analysis was done in Matlab2022b. Results The list of tests and respective scores of the two groups is provided in Figure 1. Zero‐displacement probabilities were more sensitive in detecting group differences compared to NG and PA. The two groups displayed notable differences in the following brain regions: the operculum, involved in visuospatial cognition; the precuneus, key to memory retrieval; and the posterior cingulate, which plays a role in processing speed, executive function, and memory. Additionally, the auditory and sensory‐related areas exhibited significant variations, aligning with expectations. These group differences are shown in Figure 3. Conclusion This study underscores the common occurrence of cognitive aging among the healthy population and demonstrates that MAP‐MRI is a valuable tool for assessing GM microstructural changes, particularly when comparing these changes to those observed in resilient aging populations.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
National Institute on Aging (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.