Modeling the influence of presenilin‐1 mutation position on primary outcomes of a gantenerumab trial: findings from the DIAN‐TU‐001 study

Abstract Background In autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD), the position of a pathogenic genetic variant within the presenilin‐1 ( PSEN1 ) coding sequence influences how amyloid‐beta accumulates and how dementia progresses (Joseph‐Mathurin et al, 2024). In the first trial of anti‐amyloid monoclonal antibodies in individuals at risk for ADAD (Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit study 1 [DIAN‐TU‐001]), gantenerumab demonstrated target engagement but did not meet its primary clinical endpoint (Salloway et al, 2021). Whether the distribution of pathogenic genetic variants within the cohort may have influenced the trial results remains unclear. Here, we investigated the primary outcomes from DIAN‐TU‐001 as a function of mutation position. Method We evaluated 72 participants with a PSEN1 mutation who completed the DIAN‐TU‐001 study under the placebo (n = 29) and the gantenerumab (n = 43) arms. Both arms were grouped by the PSEN1 mutation position relative to codon 200 as precodon‐200 and postcodon‐200 (Table 1). Mixed models for repeated measures were adjusted for sex, baseline Clinical Dementia Rating ® (CDR ® ) scores, and baseline EYO and estimated the effect of PSEN1 mutation position on the mean change from baseline PiB‐PET composite and baseline cognitive composite, as imaging and clinical outcomes, respectively. Significance of differences in least squares (ls) means on year 4 between pre‐codon 200 and post‐codon 200 mutation groups were calculated. Result Within each codon group, compared to placebo, the treated group had significant changes in PiB‐PET but not in cognitive composite (Figure 1). Placebo precodon‐200 group showed significantly faster amyloid accumulation rates (PiB PET composite SUVR) through year 4 than the placebo postcodon‐200 group (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.0065). However, no difference was observed between precodon‐200 and postcodon‐200 gantenerumab groups (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.45) through year 4. Difference in cognitive composite precodon‐200 vs. postcodon‐200 placebo groups was not significant (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.98). Differences in cognitive composite groups between treated groups trended toward significance (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.05). Conclusion These preliminary results show the potential influence of PSEN1 mutation position on the outcome of a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid plaque removal. Further investigation into the potential effects of specific mutation type on trial results is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095570
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the influence of presenilin‐1 mutation position on primary outcomes of a gantenerumab trial: findings from the DIAN‐TU‐001 study

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Stephen Salloway, Alan E. Renton, Richard J. Perrin et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Modeling the influence of presenilin‐1 mutation position on primary outcomes of a gantenerumab trial: findings from the DIAN‐TU‐001 study

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Stephen Salloway, Alan E. Renton, Richard J. Perrin, Randall John Bateman, Nelly Joseph‐Mathurin, Carlos C Cruchaga, Austin McCullough, Eric McDade, Laura Ibáñez, Charles D. Chen, David B. Clifford, Alison Goate, Brian A. Gordon, Jorge J. Llibre‐Guerra, Yan Li, Jason J. Hassenstab, Guoqiao Wang, Chengjie Xiong, Yuchen Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD), the position of a pathogenic genetic variant within the presenilin‐1 ( PSEN1 ) coding sequence influences how amyloid‐beta accumulates and how dementia progresses (Joseph‐Mathurin et al, 2024). In the first trial of anti‐amyloid monoclonal antibodies in individuals at risk for ADAD (Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit study 1 [DIAN‐TU‐001]), gantenerumab demonstrated target engagement but did not meet its primary clinical endpoint (Salloway et al, 2021). Whether the distribution of pathogenic genetic variants within the cohort may have influenced the trial results remains unclear. Here, we investigated the primary outcomes from DIAN‐TU‐001 as a function of mutation position. Method We evaluated 72 participants with a PSEN1 mutation who completed the DIAN‐TU‐001 study under the placebo (n = 29) and the gantenerumab (n = 43) arms. Both arms were grouped by the PSEN1 mutation position relative to codon 200 as precodon‐200 and postcodon‐200 (Table 1). Mixed models for repeated measures were adjusted for sex, baseline Clinical Dementia Rating ® (CDR ® ) scores, and baseline EYO and estimated the effect of PSEN1 mutation position on the mean change from baseline PiB‐PET composite and baseline cognitive composite, as imaging and clinical outcomes, respectively. Significance of differences in least squares (ls) means on year 4 between pre‐codon 200 and post‐codon 200 mutation groups were calculated. Result Within each codon group, compared to placebo, the treated group had significant changes in PiB‐PET but not in cognitive composite (Figure 1). Placebo precodon‐200 group showed significantly faster amyloid accumulation rates (PiB PET composite SUVR) through year 4 than the placebo postcodon‐200 group (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.0065). However, no difference was observed between precodon‐200 and postcodon‐200 gantenerumab groups (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.45) through year 4. Difference in cognitive composite precodon‐200 vs. postcodon‐200 placebo groups was not significant (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.98). Differences in cognitive composite groups between treated groups trended toward significance (ls means diff. P ‐value = 0.05). Conclusion These preliminary results show the potential influence of PSEN1 mutation position on the outcome of a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid plaque removal. Further investigation into the potential effects of specific mutation type on trial results is warranted.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Harvard University (US), Providence College (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Brown University (US), Butler Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Mallinckrodt (United States) (US), Hope Center for Neurological Disorders (US), Prevent Alzheimer’s Disease 2020 (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.